|
|
 |
Free
Agent Nation
By Stephen J. Butler |
Archives |
The book, Free
Agent Nation by Daniel Pink cleverly contrasts Gregory Peck
in the movie "Man in a Grey Flannel Suit" with Tom Cruise in "Jerry
McGuire." Peck was trapped in the corporate world of the '50's,
while modern-day Cruise breaks free to establish himself as a
free agent. As he responds to the "show me the money" cheer that
the movie has made famous, Cruise personifies a trend that is
changing the way Americans participate in the economy. It may
prove to be a systemic change as evolutionary as the industrial
revolution itself.
Free
Agent Nation documents the extent to which the American workforce
is operating as a collection of individual one-person businesses
to a greater extent than ever before. For those unwillingly sloughed
off by the corporate world, it may be reassuring to know that
there are several advantages of free agent status that many have
not considered. For those who have long-since made the break,
there are some new retirement tax-savings opportunities that this
year's new tax laws have created.
But first, let's
look at some statistics. According to the Ford Foundation, there
are about 37 million "freelancers, office temps, and independent
contractors." This represents about 30 percent of the workforce
or almost twice the percentage of people who work in government
or manufacturing. In California, only one-third of all workers
have a traditional job?a full-time, year-round position with one
employer. Pink points out that "two out of three Californians
lack the employment arrangement on which nearly all American laws,
taxes, and social assumptions are based. This hardly comes as
news to me. For many years, pension laws aimed at the corporate
environment have generated countless "loopholes for the little
guy." When laws aimed at "big corporations" are applied to simple
one-person companies they can generate tremendous tax-deferral
and investment opportunities.
One simple example
is the issue of loans from retirement plans. Many employees who
have been laid off from jobs may have 401(k) loans that need to
be repaid within ninety days. Otherwise, the entire outstanding
balance becomes taxable as income and can trigger a 10% penalty
as well. By setting up a one-person business with its own retirement
plan, the employee can now roll his or her account balance, including
the loan, into the new plan. The traditional rollover into an
IRA would not have accommodated the loan. Before 2002, a small,
unincorporated business could have offered a retirement plan,
but loans to business owners were not permitted.
In another example,
a successful consultant or software engineer working as a one-person
shop with, say $200,000 of income could add their spouse to the
payroll for $40,000 of that income. Then, the two of them could
contribute a combined total of $50,000 into the plan or $25,000
each. There is no longer a percentage limit on contributions for
any one individual, but the maximum contribution is limited to
an amount equal to 25% of total company payroll. The maximum dollar
limit is now $40,000 per person. In addition, this couple could
each contribute an additional $11,000 into the 401(k) portion
of the plan for a combined total pension contribution of $72,000.
I have left
out many of the details in these examples, but the points should
be clear. For those approaching retirement who want to accelerate
their contribution amounts, the free agent phenomenon may offer
some opportunities that many of us would have overlooked. For
those who have lost jobs and are considering taxable withdrawals
from rollover IRA accounts, the taxes and penalties may be entirely
unnecessary if you adopt a plan that allows you to borrow from
your account without triggering a taxable event.
The retirement
plans that offer these levels of flexibility are not the so-called
"Simplified Employer Pensions" or SEP's offered by the brokerage
and mutual fund industry. These are full-blown retirement plans
typically designed and administered by retirement plan administration
companies. Your CPA can help you locate a reputable firm. The
set-up cost can range between $750 and $1,500 and the annual costs
are minimal until the plan reaches $100,000 in assets.
With regard
to the unsettling economic reports and the stock market of late,
I can only say that these events represent more opportunity to
buy great value at bargain prices. The prices may even get better
before we start a long uphill climb, but steady infusions of inbound
money into well-designed retirement plans will reward the patient
many times over. For what it may be worth, those of us continuing
to stay the course are in very good company. Warren Buffet is
on the prowl and buying heavily into some deeply depressed stocks,
and I'm certain he isn't losing a wink of sleep. He doesn't buy
anything that he doesn't plan to keep for at least ten years.
Those of us who call ourselves "long-term investors" need to remember
"long-term" is ten years?not just the two we have endured recently.
|