Guided Tour
 View Your Account
 Shop for Stocks
 Research Stocks
 Educate Yourself
 Family Investing
 Retirement Focus
 Resource Center
 Our Strategy
 About Us
 Helpdesk
 Home
Google Custom Search
 


Listen Up, Career Women
By Stephen J. Butler
Archives

Our new Miss Universe, Oxana Fedorova from Russia, proclaims that she expects to become a lawyer and a mother. Meanwhile, an article in the April Harvard Business Review cited statistics pointing to a level of disappointment for the 42% of high-achieving professional women who are childless between the ages of 41 and 55. Of these, presumably 80% would like to have had children and probably will not. Further studies reach the not-surprising conclusion that women are the happiest when they have it all...career AND a family.

The article is based upon the research and new book by Sylvia Ann Hewlett (no relation to Walter) entitled Creating a Life: Professional Women and their Quest for Children. I see a need to weigh in on the subject, because I often feel that academics ignore the obvious. I also have some constructive ideas regarding the role one spouse or the other can play during the asset-accumulation phase that ultimately leads to retirement.

The fact is, corporate life is less forgiving than other professional venues for men or women. The corporate high-achiever is expected to consume 65 hours per week when factoring in the national average roundtrip commute of 45 minutes. This doesn't include business travel or evening dinner meetings. As companies get larger, the appearance of a contribution can become as important as the substance. Senior executives often maintain grueling schedules to send a message to others that, " this job is too demanding for anyone else to ever want." Above the glass ceiling, life can be strained and unpleasant. It takes a lot of seratonin in the bloodstream to endure the difficult conversations that come with the territory in a highly-political, large organization.


John Kenneth Galbraith, in his book, The New Industrial State, postulated that most commerce will one day be conducted by professionally-managed large companies. Economies of scale will drive smaller firms out of business. With a few exceptions like the fast food industry, I don't see that happening. Different industries seem to have size "sweet spots" at which they operate most profitably. The banking industry offers a perfect example as the results of giant mergers watch profits wither while newer regional banks gorge themselves on profitable low-hanging fruit.

Women maintain that the corporate world offers lots of off-ramps and then very few on-ramps. But who needs those large corporations? Fully 70% of all American workers are employed at companies with less than 100 employees. Women in this subset of our economy can find much more fulfilling opportunities with often more flexibility, more "on-ramps" and even more after-tax money.

Speaking of the latter, the marginal increase in spend-able income when a second spouse works is painful to calculate. After federal, state, social security, and medicare taxes, the additional or marginal income to the family is commonly taxed at OVER 50%...and that's before factoring in the costs of commuting and day care. With so little of the second income available to spend, a careful assessment of values and lifestyle is imperative.

We should start by ending the pretense that men and women are the same. It's the woman who will have to take the off-ramp to have children. Then, it's a question of how many on-ramps they want to create. Working part time, working close to home, studying for an advanced degree, and playing a key role in a small company are all efforts to keep options open. My life is full of anecdotal evidence of women who have had it all. My sister-in-law, with three teenagers at the time, went back to school to get a doctorate in psychology and now has a thriving private practice. An associate at my company raised seven children and managed to get a degree in industrial psychology. Women working part time have made extremely valuable contributions to our company over the years.

New tax laws can dramatically increase the after-tax value of part time work. The first $11,000 of income can be contributed to a retirement plan and in a few more years that will rise to $15,000. Woman who work as independent contractors or who are otherwise self-employed can contribute up to $40,000 into retirement plans. For many, this is equivalent to almost $80,000 of taxable income. New laws effective in 2002 offer opportunities way beyond what have been possible in the past for small companies flexible enough to design compensation packages around these tax incentives. The bottom line is that it can further pay for two spouses to work if one or both can bury their earnings in generous retirement plans.

Finally, the time to reflect on these choices is earlier in life. Time goes by quickly. Younger people can find themselves to be middle-aged before they know it. The Grant study funded by W.T. Grant has tracked the lives of a group of about 400 college students since their graduation over 60 years ago. The group actually included President John F. Kennedy. What the study shows is that people tend to do best in life if they develop relationship skills first and focus on professional skills later in their thirties. Those who got it in reverse tended to have more problems in life. Struggling with relationships is what "Friends" is really all about. In the end, it helps to remember that the only real basis for security in life comes from our ability to do something and to do it well. To worry about WHERE you will exercise your energy and brainpower is not as limited as the world of large corporations would make it seem.


Copyright © 1999 – 2008 Freedom Investments. All Rights Reserved.
Freedom Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC
Privacy & Security