|
Week
in Review
For
the week 3/10/2008 - 3/14/2008
Brian Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
Wall
Street?Bailout!
Who needs
a beer? I do.
Steven
Pearlstein / Washington Post
"Last
week, it was a $200 billion cash-for-bond swap for the banks.
"This
week, it was a $200 billion bond-for-bond swap for the big
investment houses.
"If they
keep this up, pretty soon you'll be able to walk into any
Federal Reserve bank and hock that diamond brooch you inherited
from Aunt Mildred.
"Forget
all that nonsense about the Bernanke Fed being too timid or
behind the curve. In the face of what is turning into the
most serious financial market crisis since the Great Depression,
the Fed has been more aggressive and more creative in using
its limitless balance sheet - in effect, its ability to print
money - than at any time in history.
"We can
argue till the cows come home about whether this is a bailout
for Wall Street. It is - but only to the extent that it is
also a bailout for all of us, meant to prevent a financial
and economic meltdown that drags everyone down with it. In
broad strokes, we're going through a massive 'de-leveraging'
of the economy, wringing out trillions of dollars of debt
that had artificially driven up the price of real estate and
financial assets, and, more generally, allowed Americans to
live beyond their means."
Mr. Pearlstein
wrote the above on Wednesday, so he wasn't aware at the time
that Friday morning we'd learn the Federal Reserve, working
with J.P. Morgan Chase, opted to bail out Bear Stearns in
a story that will be reverberating over the weekend as Bear
goes 'bye-bye.' In a nutshell, Bear was a purveyor of crapola,
tons of mortgage-backed securities based on faulty (fraudulent)
ratings, and its clients finally began to catch on that this
was a serious issue. Once they began to pull their cash out,
voila! A run on the bank.
And after
listening to Bear CEO Alan Schwartz the other day with CNBC's
David Faber, I can't help but remind you of something I wrote
last Aug. 4, 2007, following a very similar incident, problems
with Bear's hedge funds.
"I just
have to add from personal experience, in light of the Bear
Stearns conference call on Friday that was designed to reassure
investors and shareholders, and did the opposite, that back
in early 1989, I was sitting in on a conference call at Thomson
McKinnon Securities with senior management where our head
of retail had the mission of reassuring his fellow executives
that all was well; that Thomson was well within all capital
requirements. Thomson had a much less complicated financial
structure than Bear Stearns does today, yet within weeks Thomson
had declared bankruptcy. Years ago, on the issue of derivatives,
specifically, I began warning that, 1) Wall Street is peopled
with folks who just aren't that smart (4.0 GPAs, yes?common
sense, zero) and, 2) the Street really has no idea what it
owns. Life lessons now being learned, friends."
It's amazing
to think that was already eight months ago and, in hindsight,
that Bear Stearns lasted this long. Nothing changed, after
all. It just took some time for others to realize what some
of us knew all along. Bear and others of its ilk are essentially
a house of cards.
But for
a brief moment on Tuesday, after the Federal Reserve came
up with its latest effort to save the world, and the Dow Jones
rallied 400 points, all was calm, all was bright. The Financial
Times opined:
"Tuesday's
move was different. The Fed is not offering to lend cash in
exchange for bonds, it is offering to lend up to $200 billion
of Treasury bonds in exchange for triple-A mortgage- backed
bonds. Unlike mortgage bonds, Treasuries are still easy to
borrow against in the private markets, so making it possible
to exchange one for the other is a sensible attempt to ease
the short- term pressure on leveraged investors.
"Whether
it has any effect depends, as it has with every central bank
intervention since last July, on whether this is a crisis
of liquidity or solvency. If it is simply the case that banks
do not have the cash to lend against mortgage bonds then this
will have an effect. If, on the other hand, banks are worried
that the mortgage bonds or their owners will default, then
they will be unlikely to lend even if they can refinance at
the Fed."
For now
it's the latter.
The Fed
is hoping, though, that their move to swap mortgage- backeds
for Treasuries, for up to 28 days, helps stabilize the markets,
but one of the many problems is you might say you have a AAA-security,
but is it really? We've already seen how the ratings agencies
screwed up royally in assessing the risks inherent in the
pools of mortgages they were asked to grade. The Fed, by its
action, claims this helps take care of the counterparty risk,
but the bigger issue is still falling home prices. Since the
Fed is not actually buying the securities (and I'm definitely
not saying they should), what is the value? It's still to
be determined.
Nothing
has worked to unclog the pipes of the financial system since
the credit crisis first hit last July, and the spreads between
Treasuries and government-sponsored entities such as Fannie
Mae have only come down minimally from record levels going
back to 1986; which means that mortgage rates will remain
higher than Treasury rates would otherwise dictate, not exactly
a way to solve the housing crisis.
Speaking
of Fannie, Barron's had a big piece on its shaky balance sheet.
But since Fannie owns or guarantees ? of all U.S. home loans
outstanding, it's simply too big to fail (as well as sibling
Freddie Mac), and certainly the Federal Reserve has told you
as much with its treatment of Bear Stearns.
I have
to admit, events are taking place at lightspeed and it's not
easy keeping track of it all. This was such an historic week,
for example, that events such as Thornburg Mortgage's potential
collapse, along with the actual collapse of a large fund,
Carlyle Capital (part of private-equity giant Carlyle Group)
took a back seat to all of the above.
Shares
in jumbo loan maker Thornburg fell to 70 cents before rallying
to $3 and then finishing the week around $2.30, after the
Fed's actions to backstop the mortgage market. But here again,
while Thornburg loves to tell anyone who will listen that
it hasn't dabbled in the subprime sector and that its paper
is AAA, is it? Much of it is murky Alt-A (a level above subprime),
where even two of the Three Little Pigs weren't required to
submit full documentation in acquiring their homes of straw
and sticks. Only the pig that bought the house of bricks is
still solvent today, yet S&P is rating the pool comprised
of all three as AAA.
Then there
is Carlyle Capital, a bond fund that levered up some 32 times
and when its lenders began to question why the very same Three
Little Pigs had become part of Carlyle's balance sheet too
(remember, the pigs were sliced and diced into different classes
of securities or tranches) said, hey, hold on a second, you
have to cough up more collateral or we'll pull your loan.
Carlyle couldn't and the lenders took possession of their
share of the bacon. As Carlyle Group's CEO David Rubenstein
said, "the golden age of private-equity is over." So is the
golden age of Wall Street in general, you could add.
More broadly,
Harvard economist Martin Feldstein, a member of the National
Bureau of Economic Research, the group that dates business
cycles, told an audience on Friday, "I believe the U.S. economy
is now in recession. Could this become the worst recession
we have seen in the post-war period? I think the answer is
yes. I would emphasize the word 'could.'"
Lastly,
I am invoking my '24-hour rule' when it comes to Friday's
Fed action to bailout Bear Stearns. We'll soon learn more
details. For now, I agree with economist Mark Zandi who said
that normally, 99% of the time you don't want the government
interfering in free markets (i.e. let Bear Stearns fail),
but the other 1% of the time you do, and then you want the
government to act quickly in order to prevent a far worse
problem. This is beginning to feel like that 1%.
Street
Bytes
--Tuesday's
400+ point rally was the biggest in the Dow Jones since July
2002, while the S&P 500 registered its single-biggest advance
since April 2001. Yet in the end, stocks finished mixed, literally,
with the Dow Jones up 0.5%, the S&P down 0.4%, and Nasdaq
unchanged. If you're a technician, the market looks awful.
--U.S.
Treasury Yields
6-mo.
1.31% 2-yr. 1.46% 10-yr. 3.43% 30-yr. 4.36%
Rates
fell across the board in a flight to safety. The Fed meets
on Tuesday and the bond market is projecting that Bernanke
and Co. will lower rates a full 75 basis points.
The government
released its consumer price index for the month of February
and it revealed that prices were unchanged; including the
core reading, ex-food and energy. Well, that was simply unbelievable
and ignored by all. Meanwhile, the retail sales figure for
February was down 0.6%, when an increase of 0.2% was expected.
Yes, I'm going to cherry pick my stats and believe this latter
one because it certainly makes more sense than the CPI number.
Separately,
I received a note from a loyal reader and friend of StocksandNews
that I was taking it too easy on Mr. Bernanke recently. I
sure don't think so. I can't call him Clueless Ben every single
week. I don't want this site to become like one of those shouting
matches on "Hardball" or "Hannity and Colmes," after all.
I correctly said the Federal Reserve was irrelevant last summer,
referring to its inability to prevent a recession resulting
from the housing bubble. But I added that the Fed was relevant
as to the degree of pain that we would all feel, or more simply,
preventing a recession from turning into a Depression. No
one can make that judgment yet as to their success or failure
in this endeavor, but if you follow the global scene as I
do, it's pretty easy to come up with a scenario that is depressing
and Bernanke's legacy has already been cemented by his inability
to recognize the implications of the bubble going back to
last spring. You can throw in birdwatcher Paulson on this
last one as well.
--The
Treasury Department said the federal government's budget deficit
for the month of February was an all-time best, $175.6 billion.
Congratulations, guys! Now it needs to be pointed out that
due to the leap year, the figure was actually $33.6 billion
higher than it would have been otherwise, but for the first
five months of fiscal 2008 (beginning Oct. 1), the deficit
is already $263.3 billion, 62% higher than the same period
for fiscal 2007. Last month, the government paid net interest
on the federal debt of $20.2 billion. Now isn't that special.
--I was
not able to fully analyze the Treasury Department's proposal
for stabilizing (and stimulating) the housing market, but
there didn't appear to be anything that would remotely help
things today. As for Senator Dodd's and Congressman Frank's
own proposal to help homeowners, as much as they said it's
not a bailout, it is. I'll have more on both of these next
time, assuming another governor isn't caught with "Kristen,"
or Merrill Lynch doesn't suffer a run on the bank.
--Lehman
Brothers is laying off 5% of its employees, or 1,400, but
there is talk on the Street that total layoffs for the industry
could reach 20% because traditional lines of business such
as M&A and debt origination are off 20% to 80%.
--As Robin
Sidel wrote in the Wall Street Journal, when the large banks
report first quarter earnings next month, look for the admission
of big hits to their home-equity loan portfolios. "While banks
can foreclose on a first-lien mortgage, lenders often have
little recourse when trying to collect a delinquent home-equity
loan, especially if another bank holds the primary mortgage."
--Economist
Robert Samuelson [Washington Post/Newsweek] on OPEC's renewed
clout.
"The American
approach is to rant at foreign producers on the silly presumption
that they should subordinate their interest to ours. The resulting
self-righteousness rationalizes a refusal to do much that
would actually influence their behavior and limit their freedom
of action. It was only last year that Congress raised fuel-efficiency
standards for new cars and light trucks: the dampening effects
on oil consumption will be years in coming. We have steadfastly
rejected higher gasoline taxes to curb unnecessary driving
and strengthen demand for fuel-efficient vehicles (better
to tax ourselves than let foreigners tax us through higher
prices). And we have consistently restricted oil drilling
in Alaska and elsewhere.
"It is
a fair commentary that, by doing so little to check its own
thirst for imports, the United States has unwittingly contributed
to OPEC's present triumph. The extent of that triumph will
be tested this year and next?.We should be taking the hard
steps to limit its power. Considering our past complacency,
we probably won't."
As for
crude itself, oil traded over $110, despite soaring inventories
in this country, thanks in no small part to the cratering
dollar and a general desire to hold hard assets, which is
also why gold traded above $1,000 for the first time ever.
--The
FBI is investigating Countrywide Financial for possible securities
fraud with the central issue being, what did Countrywide know
about the financials of its borrowers before it proceeded
to repackage the mortgages into securities?
--Freddie
Mac's CEO said we are only 1/3 of the way through the decline
in home prices.
--The
median home price in the six-county Southern California region
fell to $408,000 in February, the lowest level since October
2004 and 19% below the peak of $505,000 last summer.
--On 2/16/08,
I led off with the tale of a new development, Windy Ridge,
in Charlotte, N.C., where as of late '07, 81 of the 132 houses
were in foreclosure. So I note with interest a similar depressing
story, this one out of USA Today, that Peachtree Hills, another
Charlotte development, has 115 of 123 homes in foreclosure.
That's unreal. And to think Charlotte has been one of the
better markets in the nation.
[One side
bar?the USA Today story by Haya El Nasser notes the Dept.
of Housing and Urban Development has a program allowing firefighters,
police officers and teachers to purchase foreclosed homes
at 50% of their listed price.]
--Homebuilder
Hovnanian said the gross margin on its new homes in Florida
is a whopping 2%. The average price of homes sold by it nationwide
in the first quarter was down 15%.
--Japan
and the UK reduced their growth forecasts for the year.
--Toyota
is slashing production in the U.S., while Chrysler is forcing
its workers to take a two-week vacation this summer as it
shuts operations nationwide to cut costs. Not exactly signs
of an economy that is "fundamentally sound," as Treasury Secretary
Paulson and President Bush like to say.
--Since
the New York Fed was heavily involved in structuring the bailout
of Bear Stearns, check out my "Wall Street History" piece
and a speech N.Y. Fed president Timothy Geithner gave recently.
--China's
inflation rate was 8.7% in February, with food prices rising
23%.
--I wrote
the following on 9/28/02 in this space. Sure, I was only 5
? years early, but it's still pretty good in hindsight.
"Then
there is the ongoing issue of derivatives and the exposure
on some balance sheets. This week, EDS's announcement that
it took a hit on its own share price (by screwing around with
put options?i.e., derivatives) is but the tip of the iceberg.
One simple truth bears repeating, that being the fact that
the investment community has been hoodwinked by the power
of derivatives, and some never seem to learn until it's too
late.
"As for
yours truly, I await the day when we have a massive accident
at the likes of J.P. Morgan Chase. You think these guys are
really rocket scientists and understand how all their instruments
operate in various, chaotic scenarios? Do you think they understand
that the other side of some of these trades may not be able
to meet their end of the bargain? It's coming, folks. Fasten
your seatbelt. Whether it's JPM, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch,
Fannie Mae or some other player, something huge is lurking
out there."
--Blackstone
Group, manager of the world's largest private- equity fund,
saw its profits tumble 90% in the fourth quarter as chairman
and founder Steve Schwarzman warned: "Difficult market conditions
in the U.S. and Europe will continue in 2008 and there is
little visibility on when these conditions might improve."
But fret
not for Schwarzman himself. His total compensation for 2007
was $350 million, according to a recent filing, though $309
million of this was previously disclosed as part of the firm's
IPO last June, which as you know was literally the peak for
the private-equity game.
So this
week Schwarzman was also in the news for his philanthropy,
pledging $100 million for the New York Public Library's $1
billion expansion program. The landmark building on 5th Ave.
will now be renamed after him.
As reported
in the New York Times, "Mr. Schwarzman said it was the library
that proposed renaming (it). 'They said, 'We'd like you to
be the lead gift and give us $100 million and we'd like to
rename the main branch after you,'' he said. 'I said, 'That
sounds pretty good.''"
Of course.
They all need their names in lights (or granite) in the end.
--I support
John McCain, but there are some skeletons that the Democrats
can exploit; such as the fact his campaign co- chairman, former
Representative Thomas Loeffler, a Texas Republican, runs a
lobbying group that earned $220,000 working for the European
Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS), part of the consortium
that beat out Boeing for the $40 billion+ refueling tanker
contract. You'll recall how McCain was instrumental in the
scuttling of an earlier Air Force plan to lease tankers from
Boeing. Personally, I believe the Air Force acted in our nation's
best interest in awarding the contract to EADS and Northrup
Grumman, but McCain is vulnerable.
--Two
giants in the health-insurance sector, Wellpoint and Humana,
saw their shares taken out back and shot as they reported
accelerating health-care costs are eroding profits.
--Remember,
sports fans?.both President Bush and Treasury Secretary Paulson
reiterated, "A strong dollar is in our nation's best interest."
I feel so much better, don't you?
--Inflation
Watch, part XXXII. Josh P. passed along this comment from
Domino Pizza's CEO. "For nine years in a row, if you go back
and you look at what was the average cost for a bushel of
wheat, we operated at about $3.75 a bushel. And, from a volatility
perspective, if the wheat market was high, it would go up
to $4.25, and, if it was low, it would go down to $3.25. But
it would operate in a very low volatility band. So we wake
up one day in 2007, and wheat begins to move. We could have
a whole 'nother discussion about how and why that happened.
But, nevertheless, suddenly wheat is at $7, $8, $9, and $10.
And then it goes to $11, $12, and $13. And, today, it's north
of $20."
--When
I was in Las Vegas last month, I got a kick out of the stories
that somehow it was immune to the problems in the overall
economy. Wrong. For the first time since 2001, gambling revenues
fell in the month of January, 1.3% vs. a year ago levels,
while statewide, revenues were off 5%. One thing is for sure,
by year end there are going to be some terrific hotel deals.
--The
Associated Press conducted a study on virus threats in gadgets
such as the iPod and concluded that many of the viruses were
preloaded, including ones that steal passwords, at manufacturing
facilities in China. Sloppiness is being cited, rather than
organized sabotage, but there is no way of really knowing
at this point.
--Southwest
Airlines grounded 44 of its 737s until it could verify that
the aircraft were safe, having been cited by the FAA for failing
to inspect them properly. Southwest then admitted four required
repairs. This whole mess has definitely given the air carrier
a black eye and we'll know soon enough whether it impacts
the bottom line.
--In a
PricewaterhouseCoopers survey of real estate markets across
Europe, Moscow's was rated the hottest, with Istanbul, second.
London dropped from 2nd last year to 15th out of 27 cities
on the list.
--NASCAR
driver Tony Stewart makes "Week in Review," a first for the
sport, possibly, with his harsh criticism of Goodyear and
the tires it supplied at last week's race in Atlanta. They
are "the most pathetic racing tires I've ever been on in my
professional career?.When you're stuck in a car for 3 ?-4
hours and it drives like crap, you're going to be upset about
it."
Stewart
was directing his furor at the designing engineers, and later
apologized to the workers.
"Think
about it. Every year we've blown tires. It's like, how many
years have they been doing this? At this stage of the game,
how do you not figure it out? How could you have not figured
out how to not blow tires and build a competitive tire?"
Goodyear
has exclusive rights to NASCAR. Other drivers concur with
Stewart. I bring this up in this space because it's an interesting
commentary on quality and, in essence, competitiveness. We
had this discussion in the 1970s and 80s when Detroit's quality
was called into question as the Japanese auto manufacturers
began to gain their toehold.
--Shares
in Bear Stearns traded at $159 last April 25. They closed
the week at $30. $Billionaire investor Joseph Lewis has lost
about $800 million on his position in the company. Stay away
from the guy if you see him on the street.
--My portfolio:
The China biodiesel play reported on its fourth quarter and
it couldn't have been better as the company gears up for its
mammoth expansion, still slated for completion by year end.
But the stock barely moved and I slammed the CFO in private
for not following my advice after a recent Barron's piece
questioning its auditor; as in the company should have issued
a statement of some kind, any kind. I told you in this space
that this was Troubleshooting 101. It's frustrating. I still
like the story and am holding for the long term. One thing
is for sure, the demand in China for its product will remain
strong, regardless of the economic environment over there.
I also
own this California solar power play I've written of and it,
too, reported strong revenues, but in this instance a net
loss greater than expected. Its shares fell on the news but
it was interesting how bullish the CEO is on the future, despite
the housing recession. I bought a little more at the lows,
actually.
Lastly,
I sold off some very small positions that I had on the books
just to raise a little more cash and unclutter my portfolio.
--Jimbo
pointed out that Client 9 could not secure the services of
"Kristen" until cash was delivered, even though Client 9 had
a long history of doing business with the outfit. So Jimbo
correctly concludes, "What further evidence do we need that
there is a serious credit crisis when the Governor of New
York cannot order off the menu without paying up front and,
further, leaving a cash balance?"
--Finally,
speaking of Client 9, Eliot Spitzer, yes, I was a supporter
of his when he was attorney general and no doubt he's easy
game today. I also have more important people to feel sorry
for than the soon-to-be-former governor and his family. They'll
all do just fine.
But you
will never convince me Spitzer didn't do a lot of good in
his initial crusading efforts against Wall Street, such as
in uncovering the research scandal. I also long argued that
former New York Stock Exchange chairman Dick Grasso, one of
Spitzer's major targets, was little more than a carnival barker,
especially in the days after 9/11, and of course his pay package
was egregious. It's all in these pages.
But Spitzer
himself was out of control and his tactics were too often
over the top. His legacy is a complicated one. Wall Street
needed more oversight and he helped set it in motion, but
as a person, what a hypocritical slimeball.
Foreign
Affairs
Iran:
Parliamentary elections were held on Friday for 290 seats,
though only after 1,700 candidates were disqualified by the
hardliners headed up by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The
vote is a total sham. Some argue, however, that a significant
number of those who will be elected are nonetheless critics
of Ahmadinejad's economic policies, especially with inflation
running close to 20%. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
though, while at odds with the president on many issues, urged
his people to support the conservatives. As for the people
themselves, there is a tremendous sense of apathy with the
result not in question. The final tally will however provide
a sense of whether or not Ahmadinejad faces problems with
the presidential election in 2009.
On the
nuclear weapons program issue, the Wall Street Journal editorialized:
"It has
now been nearly five years since the Bush Administration began
pursuing a multilateral track on Iran, a course it has followed
patiently nearly to the end of its term. That hasn't done
much to assuage its usual critics, and it didn't prevent its
own intelligence bureaucracy from torpedoing that diplomacy
with the December NIE (National Intelligence Estimate).
"What
it has done is give Iran vital time to develop its nuclear
knowhow and technical skill, perhaps to a point of no return.
For President Bush, whose signature promise has been that
he would not allow the world's most dangerous weapons to fall
into the hands of the most dangerous regimes, this is not
a record to be proud of."
Israel:
Behind the scenes, Israeli and Palestinian leaders are attempting
to broker a 30-day truce between the Israelis and Hamas, as
Israel has further evidence Hamas terrorists have been training
in Iran, while some in the government believe Hizbullah may
have played a role in the seminary attack in Jerusalem.
But there
is a heated debate within Israel over the issue of the settlements,
with the government of Prime Minister Olmert having caved
to the wishes of hardliners in approving the construction
of hundreds of homes in a disputed West Bank district, with
Palestinian leaders saying the move was another attempt to
demolish the peace process. The 2003 'road map,' after all,
called for the cessation of all settlement construction and
Israelis are split on the issue.
Back to
Iran and the nuclear issue, the Jerusalem Post editorialized:
""(Peace)
cannot be pursued when every U.S.-aligned Arab state is already
thinking ahead to a day when Iran has nuclear weapons and
can undermine their regimes with impunity.
"This
brings us to the problem of deterrence and containment, which
have quietly become the consensus approach within the West's
foreign and defense establishment with respect to Iran. While
only rarely expressed in public, the common establishment
view is that a nuclear Iran is not fundamentally different
than a nuclear Soviet Union was, or a nuclear China and nuclear
Pakistan are today - that is, a problem, but one that can
be lived with.
"What
this approach misses is that the Iran regime is different,
and not just, or even mainly, because it glorifies martyrdom.
The Iranian regime may indeed be the national equivalent of
a suicide bomber, but even if it is not, and is susceptible
to classic theories of deterrence, the Iranian problem is
different.
"It is
different because deterrence, at its best, can only prevent
a nation from firing a nuclear-tipped missile. It might, but
certainly cannot be guaranteed, to prevent a regime from deploying
nuclear weapons through terrorist groups not identified with
the source state. And it cannot, even in theory, prevent a
regime from using its newfound nuclear immunity to greatly
increase its support for 'conventional' terrorism to destabilize
neighboring regimes, destroy a diplomatic process, create
crises to pump up the price of oil, or spark a nuclear arms
race.
"If there
is an apt historical analogy to the Iranian situation, it
is not the Cold War, but the period that Winston Churchill
dubbed 'The Gathering Storm' before World War II, during which
the Nazis were still weak but gaining power. This analogy
holds because the Iranian regime will seek to expand totalitarian
Islamism as far and as fast as it can until it is stopped.
"This
is what our intelligence community should be saying on the
analytic level and our political leaders should be saying
on the international stage. Nor should we be shy about doing
so, out of fear of transforming an international problem into
an 'Israeli' issue.
"Israel
needs to be at the forefront of explaining the international
implications of a nuclear Iran. We have not done this urgently
or clearly enough. Now we have the worst of both worlds -
Iran is thought of as mainly a threat to Israel, but Israel
does not seem especially alarmed, so, by this measure, there
is no reason for other nations to be.
"While
we are right to treat Iran as an international problem, there
is no escaping our own role in puncturing the delusions that
are lulling the West into collective inaction. Our message
should be, and not just in private meetings between heads
of state, that the U.S. and Europe together still can and
still must prevent Iran from becoming the first nuclear-armed
terrorist regime."
Iraq:
The United States lost 12 soldiers over a three-day period
in some of the worst violence in months, while Central Command
leader Admiral William Fallon was forced to resign as a result
of an ongoing policy dispute with the White House and Gen.
David Petraeus over handling of both Iran and Iraq. For example,
Fallon wanted to see an aggressive troop withdrawal schedule
for Iraq, while issuing a few statements hinting that the
administration was hellbent on war with Iran.
As for
Petraeus, who testifies before Congress next month, he said
"no one" in the U.S. and Iraqi governments "feels that there
has been sufficient progress by any means in the area of national
reconciliation," or in the provision of basic public services.
[Cameron Barr / Washington Post] This despite the overall
reduction in violence thanks to the surge. In February, after
passage of three key laws, Petraeus was far more optimistic.
Afghanistan:
Canada's parliament voted 198 to 77 to keep Canadian battalions
in Kandahar for another three years, provided NATO sends 1,000
reinforcements, drones and helicopters to bolster Canada's
force. Otherwise, it will withdraw next year.
I like
the way our good friends up north are playing this. I would
do the same. Along with the U.S. and the Brits, the Canadians
are bearing the brunt of the heavy fighting (80 soldiers have
died, plus a senior diplomat) and they deserve more support.
Americans, particularly the Democratic presidential candidates,
should also remember Canada's role in Afghanistan when they
question issues such as NAFTA.
Lebanon:
For a 16th time, a vote for president has been delayed as
the crisis in government continues. The White House warned
"that continued delay is unacceptable" as it urged outside
forces, i.e. Syria, to butt out. Of course I find this rather
humorous since it was the Bush administration that blew it
back in 2005 by not appropriately supporting the democracy
movement in those critical months after the assassination
of Rafik Hariri. But then I've said countless times that Lebanon
is going to be one of the big black marks on the Bush legacy.
If you're looking for a shred of hope, though, maybe an Arab
League summit set for March 29-30 will produce a semi-positive
result; only one thing, it's being held in Damascus.
Pakistan:
The widower of Benazir Bhutto, Ali Zardari, looks set to be
tabbed prime minister this coming week when the new parliament
convenes, as the coalition between Zardari's and Nawaz Sharif's
parties have close to the two-thirds majority required to
strip President Pervez Musharraf of his powers to dismiss
parliament.
China:
As I go to post, reports are sketchy on the level of rioting
in Tibet, but the situation is very serious and there evidently
have been fatalities. Earlier in the week, China had crushed
protests by Buddhist monks there. The timing of the violence
couldn't be worse and there will be a growing cry in some
quarters to boycott the Olympic Games.
China
is also dealing with a surge in domestic terrorism, which
the situation in Tibet will only exacerbate. The government
had to admit an incident on a China Southern airliner was
an attempt to take down the aircraft as a woman was trying
to assemble a petrol bomb in the restroom. The smell gave
it away and the crew was able to take action before the terrorist
succeeded. This came on top of an admission that the government
acted to break up a terror ring in western China that was
planning to disrupt the Games.
As for
the issue of Taiwan, the island is holding its presidential
election on March 22 and both candidates want closer ties
with Beijing as the independence movement dies with outgoing
President Chen Shui-bian. The new leader is expected to be
Ma Ying-jeou of the Kuomintang. Separately, Chen's pet project,
a referendum on whether Taiwanese want to apply for UN membership
under the name Taiwan rather than the island's name, the Republic
of China, will be defeated as the majority just doesn't want
to rock the boat right now.
Chen issued
a parting shot, "Some people may say the window of opportunity
for Taiwan independence has already closed. But I agree even
more with the view that the opportunity of Taiwan and the
Chinese mainland merging, unifying, is becoming ever more
remote."
Russia:
President Vladimir Putin warned that relations between Russia
and the West will not necessarily improve when Dmitry Medvedev
takes over on May 7. "I do not think our partners will have
it easier with Medvedev."
On the
topic of NATO enlargement, Putin added, "You get the impression
that attempts are being made to set up an organization that
would substitute for the UN," warning that if that happened
"the potential for conflict would only increase." [BBC News]
But on
a lighter note, here is a popular joke going around in Moscow:
Putin
takes Medvedev to a restaurant and orders a steak. "What about
the vegetable?" the waiter asks. Putin looks at Medvedev and
says, 'The vegetable will have steak, too." Ba-dum-dum.
Serbia:
Prime Minister Kostunica is dissolving the government in preparation
for early elections May 11 because his coalition can not agree
on how to respond to Kosovo's declaration of independence
and relations with the West and European Union. Leaders appear
to be split down the middle. Meanwhile, Kosovo Serbs rioted
on Friday in one of their two last strongholds.
Malaysia:
Since independence in 1957, the United Malays National Organization
(UMNO) has ruled with a strong majority but the party suffered
a big defeat in elections last weekend as rural Muslims, angered
by rising food and fuel costs and rampant corruption and cronyism
rejected the Malay party and voted instead for a fundamentalist
group, as well as Anwar Ibrahim's leading opposition party.
This was seen as a political tsunami here and the stock market
fell 9.5% on Monday over fears that badly needed infrastructure
projects now won't be completed as Prime Minister Abdullah
Badawi has lost his crucial 2/3s majority.
Spain:
Socialist Prime Minister Zapatero won reelection and gained
seats in parliament, though to get a working majority he is
going to have to seek the support of parties that represent
the Catalans (Barcelona) and Basques and the issue thus becomes,
what kinds of concessions will they demand? I have to admit,
I often forget just how split this country is.
---
Pray for
the men and women of our armed forces.
God bless
America.
---
Gold closed
at $1002
Oil, $110.16
Returns
for the week 3/10-3/14
Dow Jones
+0.5% [11951]
S&P 500 -0.4% [1288]
S&P MidCap +0.0%
Russell 2000 +0.4%
Nasdaq unchanged [2212]
Returns
for the period 1/1/08-3/14/08
Dow Jones
-9.9%
S&P 500 -12.3%
S&P MidCap -11.3%
Russell 2000 -13.5%
Nasdaq -16.6%
Bulls
31.1
Bears 43.3 [Source: Chartcraft / Investors Intelligence]*
*These
bull/bear figures represent the biggest extremes since Oct.
2002, right at the market bottom. Back then, the bull reading
then shot up to 50.6 in just four weeks, while the bears fell
to 28.1 as stocks rallied strongly. Remember, it's a contrarian
indicator and just one of many used by investors and traders
alike.
Happy
St. Patrick's Day!
May the
road rise to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
the rain fall soft upon your fields and,
until we meet again,
may God hold you in the palm of His hand.
Brian
Trumbore
BUYandHOLD
does not offer or provide any investment advice or opinion
regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability
of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction
or investment strategy. Any investment decisions you make
will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial
circumstances, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and
liquidity needs. The securities mentioned above are being
used for illustrative purposes only and should not be regarded
as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy.
The securities markets are subject to the risks of fluctuating
prices and the uncertainty of rates of return and yields inherent
in investing. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The opinions expressed above are not necessarily those of
BUYandHOLD, Freedom Investments, its officers, directors or
any of its affiliates.

The
BUYandHOLD website contains links to third-party websites
on the Internet. BUYandHOLD provides these links to these
websites only as a convenience to users of the website.
Links on the BUYandHOLD website are not endorsements by
BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, implied or express, of
the linked sites or any products, services or links in such
sites; and no information in such sites has been endorsed
or approved by BUYandHOLD. Linked sites are not under the
control of BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, and we are
not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any
link contained in a linked site. No information contained
in the BUYandHOLD website or accessed through any linked
site, or any link contained in a linked site, constitutes
a recommendation by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments to
buy, sell or hold any security, financial product or instrument.
Information accessed through linked sites is not, nor should
be construed as, an offer or a solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell securities by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments.
BUYandHOLD does not offer or provide any investment advice
or opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability
or profitability of any particular security, portfolio of
securities, transaction or investment strategy, and any
investment decisions you make will be based solely on your
evaluation of your financial circumstances, investment objectives,
risk tolerance, and liquidity needs.
Copyright
© 1999 2012 Freedom Investments. All Rights Reserved.
Freedom Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC
Privacy & Security
|