|
Week
in Review
For
the week 4/16/2007 - 4/20/2007
Brian Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
Wall
Street?and China
No mystery
why the Dow Jones hit one new all-time high after another,
while the S&P 500 is within striking distance of its own record
level. Earnings have been coming in better than expected and
the March reading on core consumer prices (ex-food and energy)
was tame and is now up just 2.5% year over year. So you can
argue all you want that this isn't a true indication of the
pricing picture, especially in as much as it ignores gasoline,
beer and Cheetos, the things we really consume, but tough.
From a market standpoint there is absolutely no way the Federal
Reserve is hiking interest rates, as I've been saying for
some time now, especially given the latest CPI data.
And while
earnings are decelerating from years of double-digit growth,
so far they aren't bad. Yes, I'm a cynic and it's easy to
manipulate expectations, but sometimes you might want to forget
earnings per share and just think of the fact a company like
Google just earned $1 billion. Those of us who sometimes get
down on America should be simply smiling at this. It's further
proof that despite all our problems, somehow we keep coming
up with ideas that the world is envious of.
Of course
this doesn't mean that everyone is participating in the boom,
around the world for that matter. But I thought I'd share
some thoughts from my favorite economist, Robert Samuelson
(Washington Post).
"(The)
inequality debate is misleading. Up to a point, inequality
is inevitable and desirable. The prospect of doing well encourages
people to work hard, develop new skills and take risks. It
anchors America's entrepreneurial spirit and economic success.
Most of today's rich have earned - not inherited - their status.
Among the top 1%, more than four-fifths of income comes from
salaries and self-employment. In 1916, the top 1% relied far
more heavily on income from dividends, interest and rent.
"The question
of whether the rich pay their 'fair' share of taxes has triggered
one of those debates in which both sides are half right. It's
true, as liberals say, that the Bush administration pampered
the rich. Tax cuts on capital gains (stock profits) and dividends
weren't needed as incentives. Ending the estate tax would
be similarly unwise. But it's also true, as conservatives
say, that liberals popularize the fantasy that taxing the
rich more will solve most budget problems.
"It won't.
The richest 10% already pay half of all federal taxes, including
the 25% paid by the top 1%. Just how much these taxes could
be raised without dulling economic incentives and stimulating
massive tax avoidance is unclear. But increasing the taxes
on the top 1% by 25% wouldn't cover even today's budget deficit,
let alone pay for new programs (universal health insurance,
more school aid) or baby boomers' retirement costs.
"It would
be healthier if the trend toward greater economic inequality
reversed itself spontaneously. The poor aren't poor because
the rich are richer. Their poverty reflects low skills, poor
work habits or bad luck. But if the middle class thinks the
rich are grabbing most of the gains from economic growth,
they will feel resentful. The result could be a self-defeating
debate over income redistribution, not growth. To paraphrase
economist John Maynard Keynes: The rich are tolerable only
so long as their gains can be held to bear some relation to
roughly what they have contributed to society."
And don't
you know they have problems of income inequality on an enormous
scale in China these days. You know how you can be doing the
same thing, over and over again, when suddenly something clicks
and you have your "Ah ha!" moment? I've been to Asia five
times since 2001, from Singapore to Seoul, and aside from
the fact in about 40 days over those journeys I've seen the
sun for all of five hours total (more on this in a moment),
after my last trip I feel like I'm finally getting my arms
around the story.
A lot
of this has to do with an investment I'm involved in now in
Fuzhou, China, one that I continue to buy into in drips and
drabs (because there is virtually no volume in the darn thing),
and part of the story is a large piece of land, 35 miles from
the main plant, where far more capacity is to be built. [It's
in the biodiesel business, you may recall.] In my trip there
ten days ago it was impossible to check out the new site but
management laid out the plans on the table for me, though
it requires a leap of faith on my part. Will this company
expand in 2008 as they've told investors? If they do, it's
a home run. If they don't, I may have to sell my place in
New Jersey and live in a hovel in Fuzhou because I won't be
able to live here.
And so
last Sunday, after describing to you my trip to Fuzhou, I
hopped on the high-speed ferry from Hong Kong to Macau to
check out a place I was last at three years ago. I wanted
to see for myself the incredible development I've been reading
about and let me tell you, it's happening. Aside from the
fact Macau has surpassed Las Vegas as the gambling capital
of the world, you just can't believe how quickly the projects
are going up. Even more so than Shanghai, Macau is a microcosm
of the incredible China boom. If Sheldon Adelson, Steve Wynn
or Stanley Ho says a casino resort is going up by first quarter
2008, it will be completed by then. None of this screwing
around, five years after 9/11, to figure out what to do down
at the World Trade Center, for example. In China, and elsewhere
in Asia, bureaucracies, government regulations, and town councils
be damned. If you want to put a skyscraper on the corner,
just do it. [Watch out for the little lady living in the last
building you're about to bulldoze, however. No reason for
a senseless loss of life. And be prepared to grease more than
a few palms.]
I couldn't
stand Macau, by the way, but adding up my experiences from
2004 and 2007, I decided to take the leap of faith back in
Fuzhou. If they say the plant is going to get built, it will.
After all, for starters, labor costs aren't a problem. I left
some $40 tips with those who helped me there and I learned
later I matched their weekly salaries.
So when
I see 11% GDP growth, such as that announced for the first
quarter by China this week, it's no longer a shock to me.
It also shouldn't be a shock to hear that tax revenues are
up 25%. [More for China's military?take note, Secretary Gates.]
But there
are so many problems to talk about. Aside from the issue of
rich and poor, something I now worry about more than ever
because I wonder about the plant I'm investing in and labor
relations as a subset of the potential for overall unrest
in the country, the paramount risk is bird flu. I've been
through the live poultry markets in Hong Kong, and others
like them in Asia, but there was something about seeing the
duck farms in Fuzhou that crystallized the risks from an economic
standpoint. It's certainly not comforting to read this week
that China has not shared samples of human bird flu cases
with the World Health Organization in over a year, according
to a WHO spokesman on Wednesday. I read from a piece in the
South China Morning Post that "Telephones at Beijing's Health
Ministry rang unanswered."
There
is also the troublesome issue of the tainted pet food. It
increasingly appears that two Chinese manufacturers intentionally
added a chemical, melamine, to falsely boost the nutritional
content. What should scare everyone is that so little of China's
product is inspected, unlike here in the U.S. I think about
all the steel plants that introduce metals into the food chain
as but one danger.
On the
industrial side, what an incredibly awful accident took place
this week. 32 workers were killed when they were buried in
white-hot molten steel at a factory in Northeast China. According
to the London Times, "The mishap was triggered when a 30-ton-capacity
steel ladle sheared off from the blast furnace, spilling liquid
metal onto the factory floor three meters below. The molten
steel engulfed an adjacent room where workers had gathered
for a routine shift change." They say the liquid reached a
temperature of 2,732 F., and the incident is further proof
of the simply dreadful industrial safety record here.
Then there
is this one from the South China Morning Post.
"About
450 people were hospitalized in southwest China after a fertilizer
plant discharged a 'huge amount' of sulfur dioxide, state
media said on Wednesday." Thankfully, all were said to be
in stable condition.
Which
brings me back to the issue of pollution. The International
Energy Agency said by 2008, China will have surpassed the
U.S. in terms of greenhouse gas emissions; a full 12 months
earlier than a recent estimate. Per capita emissions may be
small, but it's about the giant coal plants and an economy
chugging along at 10% that is using up a ton of it.
Of course
the world is going to see for itself just how bad things are
during the Beijing Olympics next year. Or, hopefully, we'll
get a sense of improvements. The government knows it has huge
issues to deal with, but first and foremost it has to keep
a restive population employed, so it's a wicked tradeoff?progress
vs. clean air and water.
When I
was in Hong Kong, the Chinese government released its first
ever report on the health of the largest river, the Yangtze,
and the diagnosis was "critical." Typical of the country on
the water front, though, was the conclusion of the chief scientist
on the project. "The impact on human activities of the Yangtze
water ecology is largely irreversible." Of China's 660 largest
rivers, about 275 are so contaminated the flows can't even
be used for agriculture. [Which is related to the pet food
story.]
It turns
out that when I was writing my column from Hong Kong last
Saturday, it was the worst day for air pollution there since
March 22, 2001. "Environmentalists said the sources of yesterday's
pollutants were largely local and provided strong proof that
the government's Action Blue Sky program lacked substance."
There's
a big debate in Hong Kong right now on the building of 12
new high-rises in a dense area (as if the whole city isn't).
12 buildings, 33 to 46 stories high, on an area 1/10th of
a square kilometer. Those in the know say this creates a canyon
effect, "under which air would be trapped and pollution would
stay. The effect is seen in urban areas such as Hong Kong
when the height of the buildings is twice the width of the
streets." [I never knew this.] Of course you junior climatologists
out there probably know that all these skyscrapers lead to
well above normal temps at night since the areas just don't
cool. [Good if you like it warm. Bad for further straining
utilities.]
Well,
I know I'm rambling, but sometimes I need to clear the deck
on a few issues and this is one of them. What I'm leading
up to is not necessarily the global warming story, but pollution
control.
Friends,
like I said in all my time in Asia I've never really seen
blue sky. I remember long stretches growing up in New Jersey
when the pollution was awful, let alone the stories that our
California friends could tell us. These days we have a ton
of gloriously sunny skies of blue where I live. But this Sunday,
Earth Day, just take two seconds (if you can stomach it) to
thank Richard Nixon, because whether you hated the guy or
not (I liked him, at least then), he was responsible for the
Clean Air and Water Act of 1970. He did it for political expediency,
no doubt, but today he deserves the credit. We've gone through
some real peaks and valleys with the environmental movement
since then, but we had to start somewhere and, personally,
clean air and water is indeed our birthright. Today, though,
how do we convince the developing world it must be a focus
of theirs too?
If you
don't believe in the whole global warming issue, so be it.
But you can not deny for a moment that we must do all we can
to protect the skies and water. And that spells opportunity.
CNBC had
United Technologies CEO George David on the other morning
and alternative energy projects are taking off like gangbusters
at his global operation. Going green is officially irreversible.
Sometimes I feel like I myself needed to be hit in the head
with a brick to understand this, but on the other hand the
investment returns haven't necessarily been there. Today,
they are emerging, and so I have investments in two solar
companies, one big, one small, the biodiesel operation in
China, and my small holding (once large) in the carbon fiber
operator (think wind power).
You still
have many detractors out there, no doubt. Last Sunday's New
York Times had an article on how solar is simply uneconomical.
But the economics will change and, coupled with government
subsidies, at least initially, the survivors will thrive.
[Ethanol, however, is a totally different topic on a number
of levels.]
But to
attempt to complete the circle, and going back across the
Pacific, yes, China is overheating, in more ways than one.
They must face their critical environmental issues immediately.
In some areas the land is literally dying, including in critical
regions where the water table is dropping at unbelievable
levels.
China's
attempts to go green thus far have been virtually nonexistent,
and when they've tried to do the right thing, more often than
not they fail. Such as in one area of the North Plains, where
desertification is rushing in. About six million fir tree
saplings were planted and guess how many survived? Zero. Beetles
immediately ate them.
So in
light of all the above, why then would I invest so heavily
here? I guess I'm like all the Chinese gamblers I saw packed
into the Sands Macau casino. It's a crapshoot, in some respects.
I see a window of opportunity from an investment standpoint,
albeit perhaps a narrow one. If it hits, I hope to be smart
enough to get out before the day of reckoning, which is coming.
Friday afternoon I caught Larry Kudlow's program on CNBC and
in a panel discussion on China, not one of five guests mentioned
China's environmental issues. What a mistake.
Street
Bytes
--It's
pretty hard not to go up when the likes of Coca-Cola, Johnson
& Johnson, Eli Lilly, Schering Plough, United Technologies,
JP Morgan, Honeywell and Caterpillar report solid earnings.
Throw in confirmation of a $25 billion merger, such as that
of Sallie Mae, and a respectable retail sales figure for March,
plus the aforementioned tame inflation reading, and you have
the makings of a rally. The weak dollar is also aiding U.S.
exporters (while hurting our European brethren shipping their
goods over here), and markets worldwide have been soaring;
sloughing off another hiccup in China.
The Dow
Jones now sits at 12961, while the S&P 500, at 1484, is just
43 points shy of its all-time mark set back in 2000. Even
Nasdaq is back to 2526.
--On the
housing front, some critical data is coming out over the coming
week but for now the news still isn't good, nor will we be
able to describe it as such for quarters to come. If you're
a bull, you first need to start hearing the term 'stability'
month after month. Homebuilder D.R. Horton's CEO Donald Tomnitz
said "I don't see stabilization in very many markets," adding
"It will get more challenging, certainly, in the next six
to 12 months."
Foreclosures,
nationwide, are up 47% from year ago levels, with the biggest
damage continuing to be in California, Florida, Texas, Michigan
and Ohio. When it comes to those entering the foreclosure
process, in California the figure is up?now get this?800%
from a year earlier. [Take a moment to clean up the coffee
you just spit up.] But when it comes to the subprime market,
Washington Mutual is emblematic of the ongoing problems, as
it cut lending to the sector by 51%. However, the big guns
such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, as well as WaMu, are exploring
ways to help out those in dire need by reworking some of their
mortgages.
--U.S.
Treasury Yields
6-mo.
5.04% 2-yr. 4.65% 10-yr. 4.67% 30-yr. 4.85%
Rates
rallied across the board on the better inflation news and
weren't impacted by a continued slide in the dollar.
--A study
of Iraq's potential oil reserves reveals they could be double
what had been thought, with much of it in the western desert
of Anbar; obviously where some of the worst violence has been
in the war. But of Iraq's 78 oilfields identified as commercial
by the government, only 27 are currently producing, according
to the Financial Times.
--My friends
at Strategic Energy Research passed on a note from China National
Petroleum Corp. that the country's reliance on oil imports
will rise 60% by 2020, far higher than earlier estimates.
--Thank
god the British pound hit $2 for the first time since 1992,
thus making currency translation far easier as some of us
read British publications. [Of course I'm being rather selfish.
If you travel overseas these days, it's just further confirmation
of how grossly expensive that cup of coffee or pint of ale
is.] The inflation rate in the U.K. has been running hotter
than expected, thus the fear the Bank of England will continue
to raise its interest rates.
Meanwhile,
the stronger pound has been super news for visitors to the
U.S., where the Brits are coming over with empty suitcases
and returning with new cars and such. The downside, aside
from the prospect for higher rates in the U.K., is in potentially
weaker exports as British goods become more expensive.
--Blackberry
users suffered from a blackout on Wednesday due to maker Research
in Motion's failure to test some new software before installation.
Now I'm not a Blackberry kind of guy, but I get a kick out
of how indispensable these devices have become to many of
us. If they are so great, and make everyone so productive,
then why are we about to report our fourth straight quarter
of below normal growth in the U.S. economy? [Just kidding????or
is he?]
--In the
battle of the search engines, Google continues to wipe Yahoo's
face all over the monitor as Google reported yet another spectacular
quarter, while Yahoo fell short of expectations. Google is
now handling 48% of all U.S. search queries (according to
ComScore Inc.) vs. Yahoo's 28% and Microsoft's 11%, and that
translates into advertising dollars, sports fans.
--Yahoo
faces troubles of a different kind, too, as a Chinese political
prisoner sued it in U.S. court (well, his wife did?hubby being
in jail and all), accusing the company of abetting torture
by helping Chinese authorities identify political dissidents
who were later beaten and imprisoned. This is an old charge
against Yahoo, and an important debate, but as a spokesman
said, "Companies doing business in China are forced to comply
with Chinese law (and when the company is presented with a
request for information about a Yahoo user), Yahoo China will
now know whether the demand for information is for a legitimate
criminal investigation or is going to be used to prosecute
political dissidents." [Miguel Helft / International Herald
Tribune]
--EBay's
revenues increased 27%, thanks in no small part to the weaker
dollar as the online auctioneer saw international revenues
climb 38%.
--In keeping
with my earlier comments on alternative energy, New York Gov.
Eliot Spitzer announced a significant campaign to cut the
state's electrical consumption 15% from current forecasted
levels for 2015. As Tom Fredrickson wrote for Crain's New
York Business, "The state's '15 by 15' plan is more aggressive
than any other state's plan to reduce global warming."
One item
Spitzer is highlighting, aside from potentially greater use
of solar and wind power, is more efficient appliances; from
residential furnaces and boilers to freezers.
--Spitzer
is one of many who recognize the realities of today's world.
According to a new poll by the Washington Post, ABC News and
Stanford University, a third of Americans now say global warming
ranks as the world's single largest environmental problem,
double the number of just last year. Seven in 10 want more
federal action, and half believe the government should do
"much more" than it is doing now. [Washington Post]
Also in
the same poll, more than half say weather has become more
unstable where they live. I couldn't agree more with that
conclusion. Here in New Jersey, some state officials are saying
we just had a 500-year storm?not 100?500. With all the other
news of the week, one of the more underreported stories is
the severe flooding we witnessed out of an 8-inch rainfall
on Sunday. [Far more in some communities.] Damage is estimated
in the $100s of millions. My own observation is that it's
simply the increased intensity of the storms we've seen over
the past few years that is amazing, and obviously in other
parts of the country, and the world, it's the intensity of
the droughts.
I have
been saying for months now that the real Ground Zero for climate
change is Australia and this week Prime Minister John Howard
said the nation's key growing regions have all of six more
weeks to receive substantial rains or basically all is lost,
not just for this year, but well into the future?the damage
done is that great. And the water tables, like in China, are
declining precipitously.
--One
of the true dirtballs of the Enron era, Joseph P. Nacchio,
former CEO of Qwest Communications, was found guilty on 19
counts of insider trading, dating back to his actions in 2001
when he sold $100 million worth of stock before the company
reported disappointing earnings news, this after Nacchio fraudulently
hyped the company's financial condition.
--Russia
is the most dangerous place to fly, according to the International
Air Transport Association, with an accident rate 13 times
the global average.
--Casino
revenues in Macau surged 45% in the first quarter to another
record haul, about $2.32 billion if I have my currency translation
right; thus consolidating Macau's hold at number one. Macau
is up to 25 major properties. If you want a good little synopsis
of the business here, check out my "Wall Street History" link.
--Inflation
Watch: Brad K., president of International Swimming Pools,
your neighborhood steel pool maker for over 350 years, said
prices for his product have doubled in the last 12 months.
Brad notes that those of you looking for high-end steel grills
should expect huge price increases as well. [Brad also concedes
the housing slump will impact his business. I still expect
some premium beer for the free plug, however.]
--Speaking
of which?and now?the beer report?an irregular feature of "Week
in Review."
Dutch
brewers Heineken and Grolsch have been fined a collective
250 million euros by European regulators for price fixing.
Bavaria beer, not a favorite of yours truly, was also clipped.
But the ruling means individual consumers can seek compensation!
Road trip???
And Anheuser-Busch
Cos.' bid to register its Budweiser trademark throughout Europe
was rejected. Of course Budweiser has always had problems
with Czech brewer Budejovicky Budvar, which was there first,
as we say in the beer biz. You might recall this was an issue
at the World Cup last year.
--Intel
announced its upcoming Penryn processors will boost computer
speeds by 40%...which means faster pirating! Is this a great
world or what?!
Iran
/ Iraq
I like
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, though it's clear some on
the right, including in Israel, are concerned he's not hawkish
enough when it comes to Iran. Gates was in Israel this week
and stressed diplomacy on the issue of Tehran and its bomb
works, offering no sign the administration is prepared to
launch a military strike.
Just how
far along is Iran's program? The International Atomic Energy
Agency's inspectors at Natanz (which may or may not be the
only facility attempting to produce weapons grade material)
concluded that Iran had only about 1,300 centrifuges up and
running, not the 3,000 President Ahmadinejad and his associates
spoke of the other week. IF this is indeed the only operation
it is significant since it's unlikely without larger cascades
Iran would have enough enriched uranium for a bomb for at
least a year.
What it
does prove, once and for all, is Iran's total defiance of
the UN Security Council. But nothing will be accomplished
on the diplomatic front without Russia and China's full cooperation
and that simply isn't forthcoming.
At a military
parade, Ahmadinejad reminded us all where his heart was when
he said the Iranian Army will "cut off the hands of any invader."
He added, Iran won't oppress another country, but also won't
tolerate being oppressed. Then he signed off on an order for
more weapons for Iraq and Afghanistan.
We're
running out of things to say on this topic. Actually we did
long ago. Despite possibly being further behind on the technical
front, thanks in no small part to U.S. and Israeli schemes
to inject faulty equipment into the process, Iran inches ever
closer to changing the region forever.
Sec. Gates
eventually wound his way to Baghdad, where he reiterated what
I've been saying for a year now; Iraqis need to push through
legislation on sharing oil revenues, as well as political
reconciliation.
"It's
not that these laws are going to change the situation immediately,
but I think?the ability to get them done communicates a willingness
to work together?
"It is
very important they make every effort to get this done as
soon as possible."
So give
them a deadline. I don't blame Gates, of course, having been
thrust into an impossible situation, but he has to convince
Bush to go to Baghdad, get in Prime Minister Maliki's face
one more time and say "Get it done!"
[If Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid had half a brain, he would take
this approach instead of his incredibly dumb remark "the war
is lost."]
Meanwhile,
Moqtada al-Sadr wants the Iraqi government to set a deadline
for U.S. troop withdrawal and he pulled his six cabinet ministers.
I liked this take from a New York Post editorial.
"Much
of the media is treating as disastrous the news that Cabinet
ministers loyal to Moqtada al-Sadr quit Iraq's burgeoning
government.
"The Associated
Press said the development 'highlighted growing demands among
Iraqi politicians and voters that a timetable be set for a
U.S. troop withdrawal - the reason al-Sadr gave for the resignations.'
"Less
cynical observers might note that Sadr pulled out his ministers
because he was incapable of strong-arming Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki into forcing a withdrawal of U.S. troops - the very
people providing the necessary security for this young government.
"In other
words, Sadr is abandoning the democratic path because he was
unable to use it to sabotage democracy itself. For those favoring
a peaceful, secular state in the heart of the Middle East,
this might be considered good news.
"Sadr
owes his life to U.S. forces' equanimity; even as he kills
them in scores, their leaders embraced the (absurd) belief
that the Shiite strongman would eventually accept Iraq's democratic
status.
"Instead,
Sadr on Monday unambiguously pronounced his opposition to
any form of constitutional, representative government. Where
Sadr used his political position to obscure his role in fomenting
massive violence, he has now dropped any pretense of being
just another political player.
"So now
that he's openly opposed to the Coalition's objectives, and
Iraqi democracy itself, there's little pretending that he's
not the enemy. U.S. and Iraqi troops should treat him accordingly."
For his
part, Maliki said Iraq will be able to take over security
in all 18 provinces by year end (they just gained control
of a fourth this week). Fat chance of that.
But I
need to touch on a highly important tangential issue, that
being Turkey and the Kurds. A longtime reader questioned my
comparing Kurdish terrorists to al-Qaeda in Afghanistan following
9/11, and thus Turkey's right to go after them in Iraq just
as the U.S. went after al-Qaeda. He has a point.
However,
it's important to quickly review the situation. In the April
9 issue of Defense News, Edip Baser, a retired general in
Turkey's Army and now special envoy for countering terrorism,
told the publication "Iraq's future is the largest issue in
our relationship with the United States."
Turkey
is concerned over Iraqi Kurds' designs on independence. An
independent Kurdish state could prompt restive populations
in Turkey to secede. The United States is urging Turkey to
reconcile with the Kurdistan Regional Government, a semi-
autonomous part of Iraq.
But the
Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) is a terrorist group, recognized
as such not just by Turkey, but by the European Union and
United States as well, and the PKK has been launching attacks
inside Turkey from safe havens in Iraq. Over the last year,
PKK attacks have taken 600 lives, many of them Turkish soldiers.
No nation would stand by while that happens.
Edip Baser
told Defense News, "If the United States sends its military
to places more than 10,000 kilometers away from its soil to
protect its national security interests, we also have rights?.
We don't want the PKK threat to continue to hover over us
like the sword of Damocles. We want the problem of the PKK's
presence in northern Iraq to be resolved once and for all."
Instead,
the White House runs around saying "I can't hear youuuuu."
Of course when it comes to Turkey we're still paying the price
for not being able to launch a force into the north of Iraq
from Turkey at the start of the war. But this is a crisis,
and coupled with a non-binding resolution still pending in
the U.S. House calling for official recognition of World War
I-era killings of Armenians in the Turkish Ottoman Empire
as genocide, one that serves absolutely no purpose whatsoever
in today's world except to win a few votes in selected congressional
districts, you have a situation where Turkey is about to shut
off use of the vital Incirlik air base; from which the U.S.
has been basing much of the force used against both Iraq and
Afghanistan.
But there's
another mess of a situation in Turkey, internally, as Islamist
Prime Minister Erdogan has yet to indicate (he has just a
few more days) whether he will run for president. There have
been massive protests (200,000 strong) with marchers chanting
"We don't want an imam." The current president, Sezer, a pro-
secularist, said the threat Islamic fundamentalism posed to
his country has never been higher; as if we don't already
have enough problems.
More
Foreign Affairs
North
Korea: North and South Korea held talks on food aid and other
issues, but when South Korea pressed the North to shut down
the Yongbyon nuclear program per the international agreement,
the North's chief delegate stormed out of the room. Kim Jong-il
wants an unconditional commitment of 400,000 tons of rice
aid, while the North still hasn't been able to access the
$25 million tied up in the Macau bank, though the U.S. says
it should be available. North Korea says that once it receives
the money, it will allow UN inspectors in. I'm taking bets.
[I also totally forgot to look for the bank when I was there.]
Russia:
Should President Vladimir Putin opt not to change the constitution
and stay in power for a third term, as Henry Meyer of Bloomberg
News reports there are signs Putin may give Russians a choice
between First Deputy Prime Ministers Dmitry Medvedev and Sergei
Ivanov, in an attempt to present "the appearance of democracy
while guaranteeing a loyalist will succeed him."
This would
be interesting, as Medvedev is liked by foreign investors
and is the banker type, while I'm long on record as saying
Ivanov, a career KGB spy before latching onto Putin's coattails,
is a flat out dangerous man. But, as we've seen in Putin's
soaring approval numbers, many Russians want a thug in power.
That's Russian history, after all.
Nonetheless,
this past week witnessed anti-government protests in Moscow
and St. Petersburg, with opposition figure Garry Kasparov
briefly detained after leading a march in the former. [Kasparov
was later questioned separately by the KGB on Friday for some
comments he made on radio. Picture the FBI picking up Harry
Reid or Nancy Pelosi for questioning?..no jokes.]
It's all
about the divide between rich and poor in Russia, just as
it increasingly is around the world. Said one protester, "Putin
and his team are sitting on sacks of gold, at the same time
the country is breaking apart in all spheres." But, again,
Putin has an 80% approval rating.
One interesting
sidebar is the Kremlin's admission that the riot police may
have "overreacted" in pummeling demonstrators.
Separately,
Russia's deputy foreign minister was in Lebanon and he expressed
reservations about establishing an international tribunal
under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter for the purpose of investigating
the assassination of Rafik Hariri. This is so typical of the
situation we face today, as in Iran, where Russia and China
continues to block the West's tough diplomatic efforts on
various fronts. Chapter 7 allows the tribunal to go ahead
without the Lebanese parliament's approval and the Russian
foreign minister is saying it's up to Lebanon's legislative
body to establish it. Of course he knows the parliament is
in turmoil these days and there's no way they can establish
a tribunal. Needless to say, the White House has been worthless.
Back to
Sergei Ivanov, he told a NATO conference that Russia was not
interested in working with the U.S. on the proposed anti-
missile shield slated for Central Europe. "I honestly see
no grounds to talk about potential cooperation on strategic
missile defense," Interfax quoted him as saying. Earlier,
Ivanov told the Financial Times in an interview, "Since there
aren't and won't be [Iranian] ICBMs, then against whom, against
whom, is this system directed? Only against us?"
What a
piece of work he would be to deal with should he replace Putin.
The Dow Jones would fall 5% the day he's elected, if people
fully understood the dangers.
Ivanov
and Medvedev are "First" Deputy Prime Ministers, and right
below are some "Deputy" Prime Ministers, one of whom is Alexander
Zhukov. His son, 24, faces life in prison if convicted of
beating a man in London. Both Pyotr Zhukov and the victim
are investment bankers and the victim was trying to crash
a party.
But as
the Moscow Times reports, this isn't that rare. The eldest
son of Sergei Ivanov struck and killed a pedestrian while
driving in Moscow in 2005.
"Prosecutors
found no grounds for charging Alexander Ivanov, maintaining
that he had been driving under the speed limit. Witnesses
said Ivanov was clearly speeding."
Lastly,
this weekend neo-Nazis celebrate Hitler's birthday, so foreign
university students have been urged to stay in their dormitories
at some Moscow schools over fears of violence. You want to
know what Russia is really like these days? 22 have been killed
and 130 injured in hate crimes in Moscow just this year. In
2006 the numbers were 53 and 460, according to a human rights
group.
Israel:
Syrian President Bashar Assad told an Arabic newspaper, "We
always prepare ourselves (when it comes to Israel). Israel
is a fierce enemy. We have seen nothing from it but harm.
We do not know whether war will take place, but we should
not disregard the possibility." [Jerusalem Post] War is not
imminent, but there is little doubt Syria is preparing its
defenses.
Nigeria:
Last weekend's state elections were chaotic and this weekend's
presidential vote promises to be even more so. Thus far the
cycle of violence has gone like this. A radical Muslim cleric
was assassinated, Islamic militants then stormed a police
station and killed 13, and then Nigerian government forces
killed 25 of the Islamists. Now I'm not great at solving word
problems, but following this progression, at what point would
the nation reduce its population to zero?
[As I
write, word is 60 million paper ballots are late in being
distributed. And Nigeria was supposed to be a model for the
continent.]
Zimbabwe:
It appears my prediction that President Robert Mugabe would
be ousted by end of April will not come to fruition, much
to the dismay of the people there. But whereas Britain and
the United States are the only two countries who appear to
be putting any pressure on the government in Sudan, here the
two say little as Mugabe celebrated his 27th year in power
by proclaiming, "Our message remains clear: that we will never
hesitate to deal firmly with those elements who are bent on
fomenting anarchy and criminal activities."
What a
nightmare, and all so totally preventable. Now Mugabe's goons
are going after aid groups, which means any badly needed food
from outside won't get in.
And nice
job, South Africa. Along with Russia and China, it is blocking
passage of stricter sanctions on Sudan and in the case of
Zimbabwe, its neighbor, it's spineless. I wouldn't invest
a penny in South Africa, nor will I visit there. [I'd get
trampled by an elephant, anyway.]
Somalia:
This will be in the news this coming week. Over 130 have been
killed in fighting and the nation faces another humanitarian
crisis.
France:
Round one is Sunday in the presidential vote. It seems clear
Nicolas Sarkozy (the official StocksandNews candidate) and
Segolene Royal will emerge to then face off on May 6. I'm
interested to see how strongly right-wing extremist Jean-Marie
Le Pen polls. He's at just 13% today, but pollsters here often
get things very wrong.
Morocco:
Police in Casablanca must be pretty good because they have
confronted five suicide bombers in the past two weeks, bomb
belts strapped on, who then blew themselves up, taking only
two innocent lives in the process that I'm aware of, while
a sixth was shot by police before he could activate his belt.
This week, two of the bombers were caught near the U.S. consulate.
Spain:
I've written over the years about the real estate boom here,
particularly in the second-home market with buyers from the
likes of Ireland and Britain, so I had to make note of a piece
by Sharon Smyth of Bloomberg News.
Spanish
law lets local governments claim land for projects such as
schools and low-cost housing that benefit the community. But
as real estate prices have soared, the rule is being used
to free land for resorts and golf courses. You thought eminent
domain was bad in the U.S.? The land claims are hurting Spain's
reputation, to say the least, and the process is rife with
fraud as town councils "have concocted urban development plans
less because of their real requirements related to population
growth and tourism, and more because of what often appears
as their greed and avarice," according to the European Parliament's
Committee on Petitions, which issued a laundry list of concerns.
Basically,
if local officials mandate it, a homeowner is required to
give up 10% of their land and then help the developer pay
for infrastructure in cash or property, which can amount to
more than half the property. It's absurd, and devastating
for unsuspecting homebuyers.
The overbuilding
along Spain's coast is also scandalous in terms of its impact
on the environment. Foreign investment is beginning to plummet
and the average selling time for new properties is a staggering
35 months.
---
Pray for
the men and women of our armed forces, as well as the victims
of the Virginia Tech massacre.
God bless
America.
---
Gold closed
at $692
Oil, $63.38?OPEC's productions cuts have been sticking for
the most part as inventories continue to slide?and watch Nigeria.
Returns
for the week 4/16-4/20
Dow Jones
+2.8% [12961]
S&P 500 +2.2% [1484]
S&P MidCap +1.4%
Russell 2000 +1.2%
Nasdaq +1.4% [2526]
Returns
for the period 1/1/07-4/20/07
Dow Jones
+4.0%
S&P 500 +4.7%
S&P MidCap +9.4%
Russell 2000 +5.2%
Nasdaq +4.6%
Bulls
52.7
Bears 25.3 [Source: Chartcraft / Investors Intelligence]
Have a
great week. I appreciate your support.
Brian
Trumbore
BUYandHOLD
does not offer or provide any investment advice or opinion
regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability
of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction
or investment strategy. Any investment decisions you make
will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial
circumstances, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and
liquidity needs. The securities mentioned above are being
used for illustrative purposes only and should not be regarded
as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy.
The securities markets are subject to the risks of fluctuating
prices and the uncertainty of rates of return and yields inherent
in investing. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The opinions expressed above are not necessarily those of
BUYandHOLD, Freedom Investments, its officers, directors or
any of its affiliates.

The
BUYandHOLD website contains links to third-party websites
on the Internet. BUYandHOLD provides these links to these
websites only as a convenience to users of the website.
Links on the BUYandHOLD website are not endorsements by
BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, implied or express, of
the linked sites or any products, services or links in such
sites; and no information in such sites has been endorsed
or approved by BUYandHOLD. Linked sites are not under the
control of BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, and we are
not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any
link contained in a linked site. No information contained
in the BUYandHOLD website or accessed through any linked
site, or any link contained in a linked site, constitutes
a recommendation by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments to
buy, sell or hold any security, financial product or instrument.
Information accessed through linked sites is not, nor should
be construed as, an offer or a solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell securities by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments.
BUYandHOLD does not offer or provide any investment advice
or opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability
or profitability of any particular security, portfolio of
securities, transaction or investment strategy, and any
investment decisions you make will be based solely on your
evaluation of your financial circumstances, investment objectives,
risk tolerance, and liquidity needs.
Copyright
© 1999 2012 Freedom Investments. All Rights Reserved.
Freedom Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC
Privacy & Security
|