|
Week
in Review
For
the week 2/19/2007 - 2/23/2007
Brian Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
Iran's
Pursuit
No surprise
in the passing of the UN Security Council deadline for Iran
to suspend its uranium enrichment program and the realization
Iran is inching ever closer to changing the dynamics of the
Middle East forever. The International Atomic Energy Agency
concluded in its UN-mandated investigation that Iran is close
to installing a 3,000 centrifuge operation in Natanz that
would be more than sufficient to produce enough weapons- grade
material for a bomb or two a year. Beyond that, if Iran were
to then step it up to 54,000 centrifuges, the ultimate goal,
you'd be talking full-scale industrial production. The problem
is that for those trying to control the situation, the leap
from 3,000 to 54,000 is nowhere near as complicated as that
from 300 to 3,000.
What I've
been arguing for years was also part of the disturbing report;
the IAEA really has no clue about other operations Iran might
have around the country because Iran refuses to cooperate
with the world community.
President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "The enemy is making a big mistake
if it thinks it can thwart the will of the Iranian nation
to achieve the peaceful use of nuclear technology."
But it's
about far more than that, obviously, and now that Iran has
defied the UN, what next? On Monday, the U.S., Britain, France,
Germany, Russia and China are to get together to discuss further
sanctions and there is little reason to expect much cooperation
between the parties. Russia and China, in particular, have
their own economic interests to protect (as do Germany and
France, to a lesser extent) and while Russia is currently
miffed at Iran's failure to keep up on its payments for Russia's
work on the Bushehr nuclear facility, according to the Kremlin,
I'd be shocked if Russia did much more than pay any new restrictions
lip service. As for China, with them it's about desperately
needed oil.
But while
the pursuit of a bomb is a matter of national pride to many
Iranians, there is continuing uncertainty about the ability
of Ahmadinejad to hang onto power. For starters, the government
has to do something to limit the increasing consumption, domestically,
of Iran's chief export?its oil. But to do that would require
drastically hiking the price of now heavily subsidized gasoline
and this would lead to major civil unrest.
At the
same time, I noted a few weeks ago the comments of rival Hashemi
Rafsanjani on the privatization front, Rafsanjani being a
pragmatist in this area. Interestingly, Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei echoed these thoughts on Monday.
From the
Tehran Times:
"The Leader
called efforts to realize the privatization policies a kind
of jihad, saying if officials make serious efforts, the encouraging
effect of the privatization plan can be felt in two or three
years."
" 'The
onus is on the three branches of government and all other
bodies to carry out the changes,' he noted.
"He also
said that the economic developments since the victory of the
Islamic Revolution in 1979 have not matched the deep sociopolitical
developments in the country.
" 'Of
course, important measures have been taken in the economic
area, but we should have presented a successful economic model
to the world by increasing per capita income and gross national
product, eliminating poverty, and establishing justice. We
should have proven to the world the capability of the country
to boost economic development and establish justice.'
"Ayatollah
Khamenei said that increasing national wealth and establishing
social justice are the main principles of an Islamic economy,
adding that every economic approach that would help realize
these two objective is 'acceptable.'"
Khamenei,
the ultimate decision maker, certainly knows it's Rafsanjani
(or a younger version), not Ahmadinejad, who should lead the
charge into the modern world. There has been an opening for
dialogue for years and the Bush administration has blown it.
There
was never a reason for the likes of an Ahmadinejad to come
into power in the first place, yet there he is, poisoning
the air.
But while
it may be too late to prevent Iran from getting the bomb,
or reaching a point of no return in the weapons process, it
is not too late to prevent war.
---
The war
in Iraq has taken another deadly turn with the introduction
of chlorine bombs, which you have to understand makes it more
apparent than ever that an actual dirty bomb will soon be
exploded. At least it's clear to this scribe. And if you're
a Sunni terrorist, where would you explode it? Basra, soon
to be largely abandoned by the British and a prime focal point
of Iran's Shia-led efforts for influence.
It would
also appear the U.S. military made a critical error in arresting
the son of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the powerful Shiite political
leader, as he crossed into Iraq from Iran. This is a developing
story in terms of the consequences as the son was held for
12 hours before being released and Amar al-Hakim is talking
of how he was 'roughed up,' thus inflaming tensions. It threatens
to be a public relations nightmare.
Meanwhile,
an issue I raised recently, Turkey's concern over a coming
referendum on the city of Kirkuk and whose control it should
fall under is not going away. Turkey voiced its displeasure
over the prospects once again and Ankara will not sit idly
by while Kirkuk goes over to the Kurds as part of their quasi-independent
state.
On the
Israeli/Palestinian front, it was another lost week as a meeting
between Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice went nowhere. Prior to the gathering, Abbas had told
a U.S. envoy that the "world must deal" with the Mecca agreement
and a coalition government including Hamas. The U.S. says
this isn't acceptable. That set the tone for the Abbas/Olmert/Rice
confab and the ongoing conclusion. Unless the new unity government
of Fatah and Hamas explicitly recognizes Israel's right to
exist, renounces violence, and honors previous Israeli-Palestinian
agreements, the Palestinian people will continue to suffer
and sanctions will remain in place.
Editorial
/ Daily Star (Beirut)
"It is
no secret that the Palestinian humanitarian situation has
been in freefall since the international community callously
decided to punish an entire people for having exercised their
democratic rights in the legislative elections of January
2006. The extent of Palestinian suffering has been made more
clear this week, though, by the release of the annual report
by the United Nations' World Food Program. The comprehensive
study describes in sickening detail how hundreds of thousands
of people are resorting to increasingly desperate measures
because they are being slowly starved.
"Much
of the responsibility for this appalling state of affairs
lies with the United States and those countries that have
acquiesced in its cruel strategy of seeking to bring about
a government of Palestinian quislings who will sign away their
constituents' collective birthright in exchange for a vague
promise of eventual statehood and a few scraps of food. But
those governments are not alone in deserving blame for the
plight of the Palestinians: Both the long-dominant Fatah party
and the hard-line Hamas movement that won last year's elections
have exacerbated matters by putting partisan interests ahead
of national ones and therefore failing to maintain anything
like a united front?.
"It was
inevitable that (Yassir Arafat's) departure would open the
way for a period of considerable turbulence, and neither President
Mahmoud Abbas nor Prime Minister Ismail Haniyya was ever going
to fill Arafat's boots. All that they and their colleagues
could hope to do was to maintain a semblance of orderliness
and keep their eyes on the prize of independence. In this
both Fatah and Hamas have been miserable failures.
"To understand
how flimsy are the parties' relationships with reality, one
need only compare the current ideological debate with the
situation on the ground. The issues revolve around recognizing
Israel, renouncing armed resistance against Israel, and abiding
by previous interim peace accords with Israel. The results
have been Palestinians denigrating the legitimacy of other
Palestinians, Palestinians making war on other Palestinians,
and Palestinians violating truces with other Palestinians.
Arafat never looked so good."
Bet you
had forgotten about the little rat.
Lastly,
I present an editorial from the Daily Star, a moderate publication,
on the overall picture in the Middle East and the latest views
of the Arab World towards the United States. Much of this
is harsh and I do not necessarily endorse the opinions therein,
but it's critically important we try to understand where the
other side is coming from, especially when we see new opinion
polls that show a continuing deterioration, almost across
the board, in the level of anti-American feelings.
"Washington's
latest salvo in the laughably named and prosecuted 'war on
terrorism' provides yet another example of just how profoundly
it misunderstands the issues at hand. On Tuesday, the U.S.
Treasury announced sanctions against Jihad al- Binaa, a construction
company affiliated with Hizbullah. On the surface the tactic
means very little since Jihad al-Binaa is unlikely to hold
substantial assets in the United States that can be frozen
under the sanctions. As a gambit in the battle for hearts
and minds that U.S. President George W. Bush joined by declaring
his intent to democratize the Middle East, however, the Treasury's
move could not be more counterproductive.
"In July
1993, an Israeli military onslaught in South Lebanon demolished
or badly damaged more than 4,700 homes; Jihad al- Binaa restored
virtually all of them. Three years later, the Israelis went
on an even more destructive rampage that completely or partially
destroyed about 7,000 residences; Jihad al-Binaa rebuilt or
repaired 6,714. This past summer, Lebanon's wrathful neighbor
to the south lost all sense of proportion and damaged or destroyed
at least 86,000 homes; Jihad al-Binaa sent some 1,000 engineers
and 5,000 volunteers to conduct site surveys (although actual
rebuilding has been delayed by the current political impasse
in Beirut). Leaving aside questions of right and wrong, what
can the Bush administration hope to achieve with an empty
statement of hostility toward an organization that has done
so much good for so many Lebanese who have suffered so much
heartache because of so many bombs and shells supplied by
the United States?
"Is America
ready to take care of all those made homeless by the munitions
it has lavished on its troublesome ally? This is an important
question for any U.S. policymaker hoping to wean great swathes
of Lebanon's population off affection for and/or reliance
on Hizbullah, and history is not encouraging about the answer.
Successive U.S. governments did absolutely nothing, for example,
to end the 1978-2000 occupation of South Lebanon. And far
from reining in the Israelis last summer, the current administration
actually rushed them extra bombs - and provided them with
diplomatic cover so they could extend a vicious offensive
that accomplished no important military goals?
"The bottom
line is that Jihad al-Binaa provides people in need with useful
help. The United States arms the power that makes them needy,
pressures the organization that wants to assist them, and
provides riot gear to the security forces that are supposed
to keep them silent."
The situation
in Lebanon is about to explode again. For the first time since
the ceasefire in August, the Lebanese military fired at an
Israeli fighter jet for violating Lebanese airspace. Of course
Israel has been crossing the border for years, but don't get
me started on that one. What's inevitable, though, is a plane
is about to be shot down and then all hell will break loose
yet again.
---
Wall
Street
From the
Bank of Japan's Monetary Policy Meeting of Wednesday as the
BoJ hiked the key lending rate to 0.50%.
"Reviewing
the outlook for Japan's economy based on incoming data and
information, both on domestic and overseas economies, the
Bank judged that our economy is likely to continue its moderate
expansion with a virtuous circle of production, income, and
spending in place. Uncertainties over the future course of
overseas economies, including that of the United States, are
abating, and this is likely to reinforce the prospects of
continued increase in corporate profits and business fixed
investment."
Yup, that
about sums up the current environment. In fact I'm reminded
of Ray Stevens'1970 #1 pop hit "Everything Is Beautiful."
Whaddya say we all gather round, join hands, and sing it together.
Everything
is beautiful, in its own way
Like a starry summer night, or a snow covered winter's day
Everybody's beautiful, in their own way
Under God's heaven, the world's gonna find a way
To profits,
that is. At least that seems to be what's happening, doesn't
it? That is unless you're one of those who overstretched in
buying their home. For now Goldilocks prevails; moderate growth,
low inflation and low interest rates across the globe.
But while
the global bull run in equities continues, you have to wonder
about excessive speculation in all assets. When does it end,
and how? Here in the U.S., for example, margin debt reached
an all-time high?the highest since March 2000. There certainly
is a herd mentality at play, as well, exacerbated by hedge
funds. When does that end? What changes perception?
Back to
real estate, a sector that has seen its own global bubble,
the cracks have been appearing for some time here in the States.
Luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers' CEO, in announcing profits
fell 67% in its fiscal first quarter, maintained "There are
too many soft markets at this stage of the selling season
to call a general upturn in the new home market. Demand varies
greatly from week to week."
What we
do know is foreclosures are soaring, while everyone keeps
saying, yeah, but that's still only in the subprime market.
True, thus far.
But as
I noted last time we are now in the part of the cycle where
growing job losses in the housing sector, broadly defined,
should begin to ripple through. Building supply king MASCO's
CEO, in an appearance on CNBC Friday, said "the unemployment
impact has yet to hit the economy." But it will.
Josh P.
passed along some information from The Joint Center for Housing
Studies at Harvard University estimating that the decline
witnessed thus far has resulted in 100,000 job losses, including
from furniture, construction supplies, domestic appliances,
and plumbing, with potentially far more to follow.
But now
there are rumblings in the mortgage bond market, further exacerbated
by awful earnings news from NovaStar, a Missouri-based lender
that is paying a price for rising delinquencies. Credit default
swaps, one of those securities created by geniuses, have seen
their value plummet 20% in just about four weeks, and that's
for a particular class of them still considered 'investment
grade.' No doubt, until recently these instruments have been
home runs but there's always a flip side. Now someone is getting
hurt.
Remember,
when it comes to derivatives and interest rates, it's all
about speed in measuring risk of the systemic kind that represents
a chief danger to the market. If the yield on the 10- year
Treasury, for example, were to rise from 4.50% to 5.00%, but
the move occurs over a number of months, traders can adjust
accordingly and should be able to minimize risk. If it happens
in the space of a week or two, however, look out. Speed kills,
and that's what we've been seeing in the credit-default swap
market. No one knows what the damage is, as yet, and it's
possible it will be limited. It just bears watching and is
but another symptom of the growing debacle in the subprime
market.
Street
Bytes
--Blue
chips, as represented by the Dow Jones and S&P 500, slipped
the last three days with the Dow ending down 0.9% to 12647
and the S&P losing 0.4% to 1451. But for the life of me I
can't figure out why Nasdaq rose 0.8% to 2515. Correct me
if I'm wrong, but what great news have we been receiving out
of the tech sector for weeks now? Then again, I was drinking
Casablanca Premium Lagers in Morocco part of the time so what
do I know?
One thing
is for sure, geopolitics is back on the radar screen mostly
due to Iran, but also because of increasing violence in Nigeria
ahead of its elections. And wouldn't you know, because of
these two the price of crude is suddenly $61 and your price
at the pump is headed back up to the $2.40 level, soon.
--U.S.
Treasury Yields
6-mo.
5.15% 2-yr. 4.80% 10-yr. 4.68% 30-yr. 4.78%
Bonds
were virtually unchanged, despite a little scare due to a
higher than expected core number for consumer prices in January,
up 0.3% and now up 2.7% over the past 12 months. Yes, hotter
than the Federal Reserve would like to see but to beat a dead
horse, there is no way the Fed is raising rates this year
so cut your losses if your bet is in that direction. They
are too smart to know that if they did hike, it would cause
a recession, period.
--Remember?
"Water?the new oil." A report out of the National Academy
of Sciences concludes droughts will be longer and more serious
than previously assumed. This is of particular concern to
areas such as those that receive their water from the Colorado
River, where the population continues to soar and private
vs. agricultural uses collide.
--The
Wall Street Journal reports spending on healthcare is expected
to double to $4.1 trillion by 2016, "consuming 20% of the
nation's gross domestic product?.By then, (a federal) study
predicts, the government will be paying 48.7% of the nation's
healthcare bill, up from 40% in 1990."
--The
new management at Fannie Mae is withholding $44.4 million
in long-term incentive pay due former and current executives,
including former CEO Franklin D. Raines. According to Fannie's
regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight,
"The board concluded that the then- management team did not
meet the prescribed performance standards." Some of us still
believe Raines should be in jail.
--Ford
Motor Co. may seek an additional 20% in concessions from its
unions on wages and benefits in order to further lower costs.
During 2006, Ford spent $3,227 per North American-built vehicle
on labor, comprised of $2,592 for wages and healthcare for
active workers, and $635 for retiree health care. [General
Motors spent $3,289 per North American vehicle with $950 of
that for retiree healthcare benefits.]
--The
U.S. receives 22% of its crude oil imports from both the Middle
East and Africa, with Africa's supply slightly ahead of the
Middle East for the first time in 21 years; which is why you
hear so much talk on instability in key supplier Nigeria.
--JetBlue
founder and CEO David Neeleman said he was "humiliated and
mortified" by the problems his airline had as he went on to
introduce a passenger bill of rights, including discounts
and free tickets depending on the amount of time a plane is
needlessly delayed by problems defined as within JetBlue's
control. But the damage has already been done.
--Google
continues to battle with the television industry over content
being displayed on the company's YouTube site. 13 of the 20
most-viewed clips on YouTube for the month ending Feb. 15
were professionally made, including late-night show clips
and local news reports. As the Journal reports, YouTube itself
responds quickly to complaints from the owners of the video,
but the next day YouTube users put it back up.
--New
York City residents pay over $9 for every $100 of "taxable
resources" or 47% higher than the $6.16 average of the other
eight U.S. cities with populations over 1 million.
--Sirius
and XM Radio are finally going to merge even as the federal
government threatens to block it on anti-trust grounds, which
is absurd. The Feds will eventually allow it.
However,
if you are a subscriber don't sweat it for quite a while as
obviously it's going to take years to come up with compatible
technology and the companies aren't about to shoot themselves
in the foot with regards to the fact many of us have invested
substantial sums in the equipment. Down the road, however,
we're all going to have to pay more.
--Shares
in Hewlett-Packard slipped on unease concerning the company's
earnings guidance, but for the quarter ended Jan. 31, revenues
for HP's PC division jumped 17% and rose 40% for laptops as
the computer maker continues to build on its leading position
in the industry at the expense of the likes of Dell.
--Alcatel-Lucent
won the first of six patent lawsuits against Microsoft, this
one pertaining to the technology involved in the digital MP3
file format going back to Lucent's Bell Labs days. Microsoft
has been ordered by a federal district court to pay $1.5 billion.
Microsoft will appeal.
[Separately,
on the way home from the airport the other day I noticed that
the lawn at ALU's U.S. headquarters was inundated with geese
doing what they do best; depositing toxic fertilizer for that
fuller, greener lawn come spring.]
--Real
Estate tidbits: After mentioning my trip to Marrakech and
the real estate boom there, I saw a listing in the Financial
Times for a 5BR-5BA, 2.5 acre spread in the Moroccan city
at $4.5 million. Gotta love those Saudi petrodollars.
But in
the U.S., the Journal reports that Hulk Hogan has marked down
his Belleair, FL, estate by 28%!! Of course it still goes
for $17.9 million and 15 years ago Mr. and Mrs. Hogan paid
just $2 million. I say they end up getting $14.3 million,
brother.
--Two
other corporate mergers of note. Vulcan Materials is buying
Florida Rock, with Vulcan's CEO Spock emerging as the leader
of the new combined operation while Florida Rock's Fred Flintstone
spends more time with wife Wilma.
And Whole
Foods is acquiring competitor Wild Oats. Think Disney taking
over Sam Peckinpah.
--Equal
Time: Business Week's Mara Der Hovanesian wrote that some
of the rumors concerning former Citigroup CFO Todd Thomson
and CNBC's Maria Bartiromo may have been trumped up to divert
attention from the pitiful job performance turned in by CEO
Charles Prince. I maintain where there's smoke, there's fire.
Or rather, follow the plane contrails.
--Goldman
Sachs' co-presidents, Gary Cohn and Jon Winkelried, each received
cash and prizes of $53 million for their efforts in 2006.
It had been previously announced that CEO Lloyd Blankfein
earned $54 million. It's gotten to the point where these figures
are almost no longer meaningful when you hear about them day
after day. What we do know is the battle between Mrs. Cohn
and Mrs. Winkelried must be a fevered one as they play 'can
you top this.'
But along
these lines, Robert Frank of the Journal had a story in Friday's
edition that is quite telling. "According to a survey of more
than 200 Wall Street professionals who took home at least
$2 million in cash from their 2006 bonuses, respondents are
spending 11% of their payouts, on average, on watches and
jewelry. For even the lowest-paid bankers in the survey, that's
a bling budget of more than $200,000."
Frank
adds, "Bankers' spending - what they call their 'burn rate'
- is growing as fast as their bonuses," whether it is real
estate, art or other collectibles and, yes, mistresses.
"What
surprised me is the low savings and investing rates for people
who are making millions of dollars a year," says Russ Alan
Prince, president of Prince & Associates. "This says to me
that Wall Street expects the good times to continue."
As for
charity, respondents doled out only 4%. Said Mr. Prince, "This
is not an especially generous group."
I'm tempted
to say more than "ain't that the truth," having railed about
this sort of behavior for so long, but the above speaks for
itself. Suffice it to say it's all further evidence that when
the crash comes, be it terrorism-related or a systemic financial
meltdown for whatever reason, it's going to be uglier than
most can imagine.
Foreign
Affairs
North
Korea: Kim Jong-il turned 65, which must mean something here
in terms of benefits; like perhaps an extra grass salad or
a can of sterno. But as Vice President Dick Cheney said on
a trip to the region, the United States' eyes are wide open
when it comes to the recent agreement to begin the denuclearization
process. North Korea will stonewall as much as possible, of
this everyone should be certain, and will put off discussing
topics it doesn't care for as long as possible while lying
about some of its facilities.
And to
those in the Bush White House praising China's role, of course
China never has our interests at heart?.just see Taiwan.
Gary Schmitt
and John Tkacik had the following thoughts in a piece for
the Feb. 26, 2007, issue of The Weekly Standard.
"China
continues its military buildup and is close to being able
to make good on its threats to coerce Taiwan into accepting
its rule, while fewer and fewer of Taiwan's citizens - less
than 5% in recent polls - think of themselves as Chinese.
And the 'name game' Washington, Beijing, and Taipei are playing
now is a reflection of the tension generated by the inconsistencies
and contradictions in America's 'one China' policy. We want
a peaceful resolution of the Cross-Strait dispute, but can
do little to stop the Chinese military buildup and shy away
from doing all we can to buttress Taiwan's defenses. We want
to promote democracy globally, but find it problematic that
a democratic Taiwan has no interest in becoming unified with
a despotic China and wants, naturally enough, to be recognized
by the rest of the world as a legitimate self-governing state.
"At the
moment, Beijing is dictating how Washington and, for that
matter, Americans think about Taiwan. In late January, the
New York Yankees signed an agreement with Chinese officials
to help support China's fledgling baseball leagues in exchange,
they hope, for getting a leg up on marketing the Yankees in
China. At the press conference announcing the agreement, general
manager Brian Cashman referred to Yankee pitcher Chien-Ming
Wang, who last year tied for the most wins in the American
League, as coming from 'Chinese-Taipei.' While doing so no
doubt pleased his Chinese Communist hosts, it was undoubtedly
an embarrassment for Wang, a national hero in Taiwan, to have
his country tossed aside for the sake of the Yankees' commercial
interests. Of course, the Yankees have not been the only ones
down this road. And the real issue here is not whether the
Yankees or Major League Baseball can sell a few more baseball
caps and shirts in China. The real issue is that by playing
this game we are not moderating Chinese ambitions toward Taiwan
but fueling them."
Two issues
tick me off more than any others when it comes to this White
House?Lebanon and Taiwan. Never listen to President Bush and
all his democracy talk without thinking about how his administration
has handled both of them.
Russia:
The head of the missile forces, General Nikolai Solovtsov,
showed his true colors in needlessly ratcheting up the debate
over the deployment of missile defense components by the United
States in the Czech Republic in Poland.
"If the
governments of Poland and the Czech Republic take such a step?the
Strategic Missile Forces will be capable of targeting these
facilities if a relevant decision is made."
But we
hereby name Czech Republic and Poland "Nations of the Week"
as Poland's prime minister brushed off the Kremlin's "attempt
to intimidate" and Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg
said, "The Czechs will now think the shield is even more necessary.
We have quite an experience with Russians. You have to make
clear to them you won't succumb to blackmail. Once you give
in to it, there's no going back."
And I
liked the thoughts of Roger Cohen of the International Herald
Tribune, who offered some of the following as a response President
Bush should have given to some of Russia's renewed Cold War
talk.
"Vladimir,
I'm pleased you have given me the opportunity to speak my
mind. You are angered by NATO's expansion to embrace the former
vassal states of the Soviet empire. You see in it 'a serious
provocation' and the drawing of new dividing lines across
Europe. You suggest Russia is the target of this maneuver.
"Russia
is big, Vladimir, but memory and history are bigger. Have
you forgotten the Hungarian martyrs of 1956? Have you overlooked
the Prague Spring that followed a dozen years later? Have
the Soviet tanks and thought police that enslaved the peoples
of Central Europe slipped from your mind?
"Here
was an overstepping of borders dedicated to the cementing
in the Central European soul of totalitarian fear. I know
that I have spoken in the past of the struggle between good
and evil. I guess what I meant to say is that the 20th century
saw a battle between the sanctity of the individual human
being and the loss of humanity caused by the ferocious certainties
of Communist and other armed utopias.
"A child
of one of the new NATO members, Pope John Paul II of Poland,
was one of the leaders of this struggle in the name of the
individual against a dehumanizing system. In this lay his
lasting greatness.
"Next
time you're having problems with NATO expansion, try seeing
it as an act of prudence, a guarantee to people who needed
it that they will no longer be shaped and controlled against
their will, the repayment of a debt to Europeans whose humanity
was traded away at Yalta?.
"There
is an enduring school of thought that we have somehow cornered
you into belligerence through pushing NATO eastward and establishing
a military presence in Central Asia. I have a different view.
"Could
it be that your assertiveness, and recent rudeness, are no
more than the natural ploy of a once-great power with a declining
army and population, a looming election in which nationalist
muscle-flexing will play well, a diminished world influence
and a horde of petrodollars allowing it to dream of wielding
a big stick once more?
"You seem
somewhat blind, dear Vladimir, to events in your own country.
You criticized the imposition on the world of one state's
legal system - the American - but do not ask yourself what
legal system allows the killers of Anna Politkovskaya to act
with apparent impunity.
"And what
of the slaying last year of Andrei Kozlov, the central banker
whose mistake, it seems, was to shut down banks involved in
money laundering?
"The 'hyper-use
of force' of which you complain appears not to apply to your
own scorched-earth policies in Chechnya. Taking as a measure
the harshness of violence there, in the storming of the Moscow
theater in 2002, and at Beslan's school in 2004, it is legitimate
to ask how Russia would have responded to a terrorist attack
that took not tens, nor hundreds, but thousands of lives in
two major cities. As you recall, Vladimir, we suffered just
such an attack."
I would
just add that with regards to Chechnya, if you want further
evidence (not that you should need it) of the direction the
Kremlin is taking under Putin look to the appointment of 30-
year-old Ramzan Kadyrov as acting president. Putin will quickly
formalize the move by decree (recall Putin abolished direct
elections of regional governors back in 2004), but what you
need to know is Ramzan Kadyrov is not only the son of a man
who was once Chechnya's president and then assassinated in
'04, but as I've noted before in this space, Ramzan has been
basically adopted by Putin. And who is this kid? He is an
absolutely horrible, vile, disgusting thug that's a walking
human rights nightmare with his own private militia. This,
comrades, is the face of today's Russia.
Kosovo:
The UN has laid out a framework for 'almost' independence
for the disputed territory, with the 90% majority Albanian
Kosovars to get their own flag, constitution and national
anthem, but not full independence as yet. However, Serbia
continues to vehemently oppose this in speaking for its Serbian
minority in Kosovo and as I've warned this is going to be
an increasingly big story. Maybe not a market mover, but remember,
any requirement for an increased NATO presence to keep the
two sides apart means a reduction in available resources elsewhere,
such as for Afghanistan.
Tunisia:
I noted last time that North Africa has been the scene of
quite a bit of terrorist activity since 9/11, particularly
in Morocco, but for decades that's already been the case in
Algeria. Now the Herald Tribune reports that once sleepy Tunisia
is emerging as a new potential haven for al-Qaeda. A brutal
Algerian group, linked to Osama bin-Laden, is organizing extremist
groups as part of its plan to cover this part of the continent.
A French
counterterrorist official told reporter Craig S. Smith that
the Algerian/Tunisian/Moroccan threat is the greatest one
facing France today.
"We know
from cases we're working on that the (group's) mission is
now to recruit people in Morocco and in Tunisia, train them
and send them back to their countries of origin or Europe
to mount attacks."
Somalia:
Along the lines of the above, those hoping Somalia wouldn't
become a safe haven for terrorists after Ethiopia's recent
action to install a government more to the West's liking have
to rethink their positions as an insurgency has now taken
hold, just weeks after the new government regained control
from the Islamists. 15 were killed in a mortar attack this
week.
India/Pakistan:
At least the governments here did not overreact to the terrorist
attack on an India-Pakistan train that killed 65. Both immediately
condemned it.
But the
attack itself was chilling. Two men boarded the train from
the starting point in Delhi, after which they began arguing
with the conductor, saying they were on the wrong train, according
to the London Times. The train then slowed to allow the two
to jump off. 15 minutes later their bombs exploded.
"The train
is supposed to head from the capital to Atari, at the Pakistani
border, without any stops, and the revelation that two were
allowed to get off appeared to highlight what many passengers
already say - that security on trains and at the stations
is cursory, at best."
Pakistan
had its own horrific act of terrorism this week when the female
minister for social welfare was assassinated by a fanatic
upset that she was not covering her head.
Philippines:
A UN envoy has accused the army of being "in a state of almost
total denial" about a wave of political killings. As reported
by BBC News, one human rights group says 832 "extra- judicial
killings since 2001 can be blamed on the security forces.
Of these, it says 356 are left-wing activists." This is separate
from the ongoing insurgency the government is fighting and
more than a bit disturbing.
Italy:
Between 1945 and 2001, the average government in Italy lasted
about 9-10 months. This week Prime Minister Romano Prodi resigned
after a similar length of time in office when his unwieldy
nine-party coalition couldn't agree on Prodi's two chief foreign
policy objectives; keeping Italian forces in Afghanistan and
permitting the expansion of a U.S. military base in Vicenza.
A new governing coalition will probably still have Prodi at
its head.
Meanwhile,
anti-U.S. rhetoric is soaring due in no small part to the
other issue here, the indictment of 26 Americans, mostly CIA,
for the rendition of the Egyptian man four years ago who is
claiming he was tortured.
Zimbabwe:
$60,000 may not seem like a lot these days, but in Zimbabwe
it's a ton and represents the figure spent on Robert Mugabe's
83rd birthday celebration, much to the consternation of a
rapidly growing number of opponents. When you have inflation
of 1,600% and an unemployment rate of 70%, after a while you
begin to finally wake up and the people here are. For example,
we are seeing the reemergence of opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai, whose supporters attempted to hold a court- sanctioned
protest last Sunday, only to see dozens arrested by Mugabe's
goons. Three days later Mugabe banned all political activity
for three months.
When one
looks back on the history of this crazy decade, I argue that
9/11 would not have taken place (as I did in this space long
ago) had the United States and Britain taken out Mugabe and
installed the duly-elected Tsvangirai in 2000. Osama Bin Laden
saw the West's inability to respond to the clearest breach
of international norms of behavior, and in our failing to
act drew his own conclusions. In so many ways the world has
been paying a price ever since. Maybe now, however, the people
of Zimbabwe will finally take matters into their own hands,
storm the palace and hang Mugabe.
---
Pray for
the men and women of our armed forces.
God bless
America.
---
Gold closed
at $685?highest since 5/06
Oil, $61.14?highest of '07
Returns
for the week 2/19-2/23
Dow Jones
-0.9% [12647]
S&P 500 -0.4% [1451]
S&P MidCap +1.0%
Russell 2000 +1.0%
Nasdaq +0.8% [2515]
Returns
for the period 1/1/07-2/23/07
Dow Jones
+1.5%
S&P 500 +2.3%
S&P MidCap +7.9%
Russell 2000 +4.9%
Nasdaq +4.1%
Bulls
50.0
Bears 22.2 [Source: Chartcraft / Investors Intelligence]
Have a
great week. I appreciate your support.
Brian
Trumbore
BUYandHOLD
does not offer or provide any investment advice or opinion
regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability
of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction
or investment strategy. Any investment decisions you make
will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial
circumstances, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and
liquidity needs. The securities mentioned above are being
used for illustrative purposes only and should not be regarded
as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy.
The securities markets are subject to the risks of fluctuating
prices and the uncertainty of rates of return and yields inherent
in investing. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The opinions expressed above are not necessarily those of
BUYandHOLD, Freedom Investments, its officers, directors or
any of its affiliates.

The
BUYandHOLD website contains links to third-party websites
on the Internet. BUYandHOLD provides these links to these
websites only as a convenience to users of the website.
Links on the BUYandHOLD website are not endorsements by
BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, implied or express, of
the linked sites or any products, services or links in such
sites; and no information in such sites has been endorsed
or approved by BUYandHOLD. Linked sites are not under the
control of BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments, and we are
not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any
link contained in a linked site. No information contained
in the BUYandHOLD website or accessed through any linked
site, or any link contained in a linked site, constitutes
a recommendation by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments to
buy, sell or hold any security, financial product or instrument.
Information accessed through linked sites is not, nor should
be construed as, an offer or a solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell securities by BUYandHOLD or Freedom Investments.
BUYandHOLD does not offer or provide any investment advice
or opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability
or profitability of any particular security, portfolio of
securities, transaction or investment strategy, and any
investment decisions you make will be based solely on your
evaluation of your financial circumstances, investment objectives,
risk tolerance, and liquidity needs.
Copyright
© 1999 2012 Freedom Investments. All Rights Reserved.
Freedom Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC
Privacy & Security
|