|
In the
previous article I produced a short history about Website
accessibility issues and possible legislation that would affect
how corporations build and maintain Websites in the near future.
While none of these issues have become "law" for business
or personal Websites, Europe and the U.K. seem intent on pressing
this issue as they hash out the languages contained within
certain policies. What does this mean for investment and employment
possibilities in the U.S.?
From my
vantage point as a Web designer and as a writer, I see good
news and bad news in both arenas. I'll give you the bad news
this week, because the bad news isn't that bad. And, you need
to understand the bad before I tell you about the good.
If you
type the words, "accessibility lawsuits" into your favorite
search engine and look for recent news about this topic, you'll
discover that most accessibility liability lawsuits in the
U.S. focus on the handicapped and their lack of access to
physical buildings. But, if you type "Website accessibility
lawsuits" into a search engine, you'll discover some companies
which have been sued over the past five years over inaccessibility,
mainly by blind Internet users.
Is there
a connection between accessibility to public buildings and
to Websites? In the U.S., yes. For instance, access to public
buildings is moderated by the American Disabilities Act, or
the ADA, and defined by the Americans
with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
However, the ADA also covers telecommunications issues, and
that's where the line between physical and virtual reality
becomes blurred. The Department of Justice perpetuates this
confusion as they currently debate whether corporate Websites
are "public places of accommodation" rather than "services"
as defined by some European countries.
Accordingly,
the United
States Access Board, a federal agency which is committed
to accessible design, also addresses building codes, telecommunications,
and - as of 2000 - Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility
Standards. However, the latter standards apply only to federal
government Websites. The deadline for all federal Website
compliancy was
21 Jun 2001, but many federal sites still remain inaccessible
to users (although all new federal sites must be accessible
to as many users as possible). And, while these federal mandates
haven't floated down to state government or corporate Websites,
the push is on to create more online accessibility in these
areas.
How does
this push affect your investment choices? At the moment, the
only thing that suffers in an inaccessible Website lawsuit
is that corporation's public image, because - under current
conditions - the case will most likely be thrown out of court.
In most cases, a smear on corporate public image creates only
a minor blip in stock market charts. However, if you think
about bottom lines rather than human rights issues, inaccessibility
means that some people with money cannot access certain sites
to buy goods and services.
As the
UK and Europe continue to press the legalities of corporate
Website accessibility, and as users and developers continue
to press human rights issues, the possibility that your investment
choice may be embroiled in a Web accessibility lawsuit may
increase.Who will be to blame when your company is sued for
Website inaccessibility? Most likely, the finger(s) will point
to theWeb developer who oversees the Web development or the
person who commissions the Website to be built. In
some cases, this person is in-house, and you might not hear
about that person's fate and your stock may not feel the repurcussions
from changes to the in-house Web development department if
that corporation is sued.
In other
cases, an advertising and/or design agencies - even other
corporations - are employed to oversee corporate Website development.
If you invest in any design agency, you might investigate
now whether that agency knows about the issues I discussed
in the previous article. If they don't, then I would wonder
why, especially since this subject is a hot topic in the Web
development world. If you invest in an agency that repeatedly
creates inaccessible sites, then your stock in that firm may
suffer if their clients are sued for Website inaccessibility.
How do
you know if your investment is concerned about their Website
accessibility? The best way to discover whether they've addressed
the issue or not is to look for a page about accessibility
on their Website. Another way to research corporate Website
accessibility issues is to peruse the pages at GAWDS
(The Guild of Accessible Website Designers). While you may
learn about some bad news at this site, you can also learn
about the companies that are concerned about accessibility
standards.
The other
issue about Website accessibility concerns user agent manufacturers,
or companies which produce computers and operating systems
(OS) which run the computer's browser. While browsers have
become more and more compatible over the past decade, only
certain browsers can employ the use of braille or screen reader
technology. You can learn more about this latter technology
when you type "assistive technology" into your search engine.
Another
way to investigate whether your tech investment manufactures
accessible machines is to look at the World Wide Web Consortium's
(W3C) User
Agent Accessibility Guidelines and compare their standards
to what your investment offers in their merchandise. You might
be surprised at how many technology firms don't maintain Websites
that can be read by disabled or blind viewers, let alone produce
equipment which doesn't meet accessiblility standards.
The only
other bad news I have about possible accessibility legislation
is that you might lose your job if you work on Websites and
if you don't understand accessibility issues. If you're involved
with companies that produce telecommunications equipment,
you might bone up on the information as well. Face it - although
legislation might be years away from reality, the issues are
on the table now. Once you become familiar with the issues,
the good news will arrive?next week!
Until
Then,
Linda Goin
|