|
Levittown
Brian
Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
At the end of World War II, as the
GIs came streaming home, there was a crying need in
America for affordable housing. No one is more associated
with a major solution to the problem than William
Levitt.
Levitt
was the grandson of a rabbi who emigrated from Russia
to Brooklyn, N.Y. Young Bill, his father and brother
got into the housing industry and in 1941, the Levitt
family won a contract to build 1,600 row houses for
shipyard workers in Norfolk, Virginia. With this project
Levitt also began to work out his ideas on taking
Henry Ford's theories for the auto assembly line and
applying them to homebuilding.
Levitt
served as a Seabee in World War II, constructing air
strips for the Navy. When the war was over, and now
38, he recognized that the government was supplying
the incentives for him to follow his dreams. VA mortgages
enabled families to move out of the big cities and
crowded apartments, where generations often lived
together, and out into the boroughs; in Levitt's case
the suburbs of New York City. As he later recalled,
"The market was there and the government was providing
the financing, how could we lose?"
Levitt
and his brother, Alfred, had been accumulating land
about 30 miles from Manhattan, on the Queens border
in an area called Island Trees, part of Nassau County.
From 1947 to 1951, the Levitts put up 17,500 homes
in two basic models, "ranches" and "Cape Cods," employing
the mass-production techniques developed by Ford.
William Levitt explained.
"What
it amounted to was a reversal of the Detroit assembly
line. There, the car moved while the workers stayed
at their stations. In the case of our houses, it was
the workers who moved, doing the same job at different
locations. To the best of my knowledge, no one had
ever done that before." [Sobel]
The
workers were organized in teams, each responsible
for a different task. It's important to emphasize,
though, that these were not "factory-built" houses,
but rather on-site construction.
In
a piece for Time magazine during this era, a reporter
wrote:
"Every
hundred feet the trucks stopped and dropped off identical
bundles of lumber, pipes, bricks, shingles and copper
tubing, all as neatly packaged as loaves from a bakery.
Near the bundles giant machines with an endless chain
of buckets ate into the earth taking just thirteen
minutes to dig a narrow four foot trench around a
25 by 32 foot rectangle. Then came more trucks loaded
with cement and laid a four inch foundation for the
house in the rectangle. After the machines came the
men. On nearby slabs already dry they worked in crews
of two and three laying bricks, raising studs, nailing
boards, painting, sheathing, shingling. Each crew
did its special job and hurried on to the next site.
A new one was finished every fifteen minutes."
The
initial models rented for $65 a month with an option
to buy for $6,990. Soon the price was raised to $7,990
and after 1949 they could only be purchased, not rented.
As Robert Sobel describes, "For this amount the new
Levitt owners got a home on what usually was a sixty-by-one-hundred-foot
lot, which consisted of two bedrooms, a living room,
kitchen -complete with GE refrigerator and Bendix
washing machine - and bathroom, with eight hundred
square feet of living space. The house came with an
attic that might be expanded into two additional rooms
and another bathroom. There were no basements, but
instead each house was erected on a concrete slab."
[With this last bit the town of Hempstead complained,
since such construction was banned, but Levitt got
the waivers.]
Well,
you can imagine that while the home owners loved their
new freedom, there were a ton of critics. Perhaps
most famously were the comments from John Keats who
penned a book "The Crack in the Picture Window." Keats
wrote of crooked developers and developments, "'nurtured
by greed, corroding everything they touched,' which
had been 'vomited up' by heartless speculators who
destroy the landscape with their rows of 'identical
boxes spreading like gangrene.'" [Sobel]
Keats
didn't name Levitt, specifically, but he didn't have
to. Keats explained:
"Then
he (his unnamed developer) whistled up the bulldozers
to knock down all the trees, bat the lumps off the
terrain, and level the ensuing desolation. Then up
went the houses, one after another, all alike, and
none of those built immediately after the war had
any more floor space than a moderately priced two-
bedroom apartment?.The result was a little box on
a cold concrete slab?A nine-by-twelve rug spread under
the largest room wall to wall, and there was a sheet
of plate glass in the living-room wall. That, the
builder said, was the picture window. The picture
it framed was of the box across the treeless street."
In
describing what came to be called Levittown, Keats
was comparing the development to two- and three-story
family homes in towns far from America's big cities.
But to criticize Levittown simply wasn't fair. The
parents of those moving in didn't live in the homes
of Hannibal, Missouri, but rather in tenements, often
in rundown neighborhoods and sharing it with their
son's or daughter's family. For these prospects, Levitt's
developments and others that quickly followed fulfilled
life-long dreams of open space and a detached home
of their own.
But
all was not peaches and cream, that's for sure. Levitt
placed severe restrictions on his work. For starters,
the initial tenants were all white and mostly Christian.
Blacks were excluded, until the 1960s even though
a court ruled earlier the clause was unconstitutional.
There were also to be no fences, and there was no
laundry on the lines on weekends. In addition, the
deed stipulated that the homeowner mow his lawn on
a regular basis.
Levitt's
success bred imitation, however, and in 1947, 60,000
units went up in Los Angeles alone, while one developer,
Joseph Eichler, teamed with architect Robert Anshen
to offer 51 variations of their standard three-bedroom,
one-bath model that they built in Sunnyvale, near
San Jose. These were priced at $9,500 and sold out
in weeks. [Eichler was also one of the first to break
through the color barrier.] Regional builders, such
as Eugene Glick of Indianapolis, flourished.
From
1946 to 1955, two-thirds of the new housing constructed
in the U.S. was in metropolitan areas; of that, 80
percent was in "suburbia." In 1960, the census revealed
that for the first time in American history, a majority
of Americans lived in suburbs. All of this added up
to wealth, particularly for the builders and suppliers
of building materials.
And
many decades later, while most of the projects of
the inner city became dumps, communities like Levittown
flourished. Some of the original owners sold their
homes at nice profits and used that for down payments
on a bigger home in a more affluent suburb. By 1990,
the $7,000 box was going for $135,000- 150,000 and
they were hardly recognizable as over time they underwent
huge facelifts.
But
the debate continues to this day between those who
voice opposition to developments like Levittown and
those who support them. Author Robert Sobel compared
two letters to the New York Times in early 1999. One
wrote:
"Sprawl
has become instrumental in the destruction of any
sense of community within both large and small cities
across the country. New developments?have done more
to fractionalize communities along racial, economic
and political lines than any other time in our country's
history."
Another
took issue with those desiring a pristine environment.
"Areas
that otherwise would be given over to job creation
and highly profitable logging, strip mining and oil
drilling are being expropriated by wild animals, which
are inherently valueless since they contribute nothing
to our economy. Once these beasts establish themselves,
shielded by hellbent wildlife-protection groups and
misguided politicians from Al Gore to Christie Todd
Whitman (ed. and I could add today's New Jersey Governor
McGreevey), they can never be dislodged.
"But
these animals are only the unwitting servants of the
quaint- seeming 'country folk' whose diabolical plan
is to eradicate or make unlivable our suburbs and
cities by covering our streets, sidewalks and highways
with grass, shrubbery and trees. They want to inundate
shopping malls and sports arenas with lakes, ponds
and streams; replace our condo developments with 'picturesque'
villages and hamlets and our suburban tract homes
with drafty old-fashioned farmhouses."
Ah,
it's a great country.
As
for Levitt, he used to famously reply, "No man who
owns his own house and lot can be a communist."
Unfortunately,
Levitt's later years were not filled with success.
While he sold his company in 1968 to ITT for $92 million
in ITT stock, Levitt then proceeded to lose his fortune
in various ventures, including $34 million to Ayatollah
Khomeini of Iran when Khomenei reneged on a deal.
Then in 1981, Levitt was charged with taking money
from a charitable foundation he established and was
forced to repay $5 million. He died in 1994 at the
age of 87, a ruined and broken man.
Sources:
Evans,
Harold. "The American Century"
Jennings, Peter and Todd Brewster. "The Century"
Sobel, Robert. "The Pursuit of Wealth"
Sobel, Robert. "The Great Boom"
Weber, Joseph. Business Week
Brian
Trumbore
BUYandHOLD
does not recommend any securities. The securities
mentioned above are being used for informational purposes
only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell
or as a solicitation of an offer to buy.
|