|
Greenspan
on Deficits
Brian
Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
Following are excerpts from an important
speech given by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan
to a banking conference in Frankfurt, Germany on November
19, 2004.
U.S.
markets moved sharply lower when details emerged,
as the chairman addressed the issue of soaring deficits
and American reliance on foreigners to finance it.
While the overall theme echoes sentiments long expressed
by market and economic strategists, coming as it did
from Greenspan sent a clear signal there is concern
a monetary crisis could occur sooner than later.
---
"Foreign
exchange trading volumes have grown rapidly, and the
magnitude of cross-border claims continues to increase
at an impressive rate. Although international trade
in goods, services, and assets rose markedly after
World War II, a persistent dispersion of current account
balances across countries did not emerge until recent
years. But, as the U.S. deficit crossed 4 percent
of GDP in 2000, financed with the current account
surpluses of other countries, the widening dispersion
of current account balances became more evident. Previous
postwar increases in trade relative to world GDP had
represented a more balanced grossing up of exports
and imports without engendering chronic large trade
deficits in the United States, and surpluses among
many other countries.
"Home
bias - the propensity of residents of a country to
invest their savings disproportionately in domestic
assets - prevailed for most of the post-World War
II period?.
"That
bias, however, diminished rather dramatically over
the past ten years, arguably in large measure because
of the acceleration in productivity growth in the
United States. The associated elevation of expected
real rates of return relative to those available elsewhere
increased investment opportunities in the United States?.
"Basic
national income accounting implies that domestic saving
less domestic investment is equal to net foreign investment,
a close approximation of a nation's current account
balance. The correlation coefficient between domestic
saving and domestic investment varies inversely over
time with the dispersion of current account balances
across countries. Obviously, if the correlation coefficient
is 1.0, meaning that every country allocates its domestic
saving only to domestic investment, then no country
has a current account deficit, and the variance of
world current account balances is zero. As the correlation
coefficient falls, as it has over the past decade,
one would expect the near algebraic equivalent - the
dispersion of current account balances - to increase.
And, of course, it has. Over the past ten years, a
large current account deficit has emerged in the United
States matched by current account surpluses in other
countries?.
"Current
account imbalances, per se, need not be a problem,
but 'cumulative' deficits, which result in a marked
decline of a country's net international investment
position - as is occurring in the United States -
raise more complex issues. The U.S. current account
deficit has risen to more than 5 percent of GDP. Because
the deficit is essentially the change in net claims
against U.S. residents, the U.S. net international
investment position excluding valuation adjustments
must also be declining in dollar terms at an annual
pace equivalent to roughly 5 percent of U.S. GDP.
"The
question now confronting us is how large a current
account deficit in the United States can be financed
before resistance to acquiring new claims against
U.S. residents leads to adjustment. Even considering
heavy purchases by central banks of U.S. Treasury
and agency issues, we see only limited indications
that the large U.S. current account deficit is meeting
financing resistance. Yet, net claims against residents
of the United States cannot continue to increase forever
in international portfolios at their recent pace.
Net debt service cost, though currently still modest,
would eventually become burdensome. At some point,
diversification considerations will slow and possibly
limit the desire of investors to add dollar claims
to their portfolios.
"Resistance
to financing, however, is likely to emerge well before
debt servicing becomes an issue, or before the economic
return on assets invested in the United States or
in dollars more generally starts to erode. Even if
returns hold steady, a continued buildup of dollar
assets increases concentration risk.
"Net
cross-border claims against U.S. residents now amount
to about one-fourth of annual U.S. GDP. A continued
financing even of today's current account deficits
as a percentage of GDP doubtless will, at some future
point, increase shares of dollar claims in investor
portfolios to levels that imply an unacceptable amount
of concentration risk.
"This
situation suggests that international investors will
eventually adjust their accumulation of dollar assets
or, alternatively, seek higher dollar returns to offset
concentration risk, elevating the cost of financing
of the U.S. current account deficit and rendering
it increasingly less tenable. If a net importing country
finds financing for its net deficit too expensive,
that country will, of necessity, import less.
"It
seems persuasive that, given the size of the U.S.
current account deficit, a diminished appetite for
adding to dollar balances must occur at some point.
But when, through what channels, and from what level
of the dollar? Regrettably, no answer to those questions
is convincing. This is a reason that forecasting the
exchange rate for the dollar and other major currencies
is problematic?.
"U.S.
policy initiatives can reinforce other factors in
the global economy and marketplace that foster external
adjustment. Policy success, of course, requires that
domestic saving must rise relative to domestic investment.
Policy initiatives addressing individual components
of domestic saving in years past appear to have had
significant effects on total domestic saving, even
though changes in the individual components are not
wholly independent of one another.
"Reducing
the federal budget deficit (or preferably moving it
to surplus) appears to be the most effective action
that could be taken to augment domestic saving. Significantly
increasing private saving in the United States - more
particularly, finding policies that would elevate
the personal saving rate from its current extraordinarily
low level - of course would also be helpful. Corporate
saving in the United States has risen to its highest
rate in decades and is unlikely to increase materially.
Alternative approaches to reducing our current account
imbalance by reducing domestic investment or inducing
recession to suppress consumption obviously are not
constructive long-term solutions.
"It
is of course possible that U.S. policy initiatives
directed at closing the gap between our domestic investment
and domestic saving, and hence narrowing our current
account deficit, may not suffice. But should such
initiatives fall short, the marked increase in the
economic flexibility of the American economy that
has developed in recent years suggests that market
forces should over time restore, without crises, a
sustainable U.S. balance of payments. At least this
is the experience of developed countries, which since
1980, have managed and eliminated large current account
deficits, some in double digits, without major disruption?.
"Although
we have examples of the efficacy of flexibility in
selected markets and evidence that, among developed
countries, current account deficits, even large ones,
have been defused without significance consequences,
we cannot become complacent. History is not an infallible
guide to the future. We in the United States need
to continue to increase our degree of flexibility
and resilience. Similar initiatives elsewhere will
enhance global resilience to shocks.
"Many
steps have been taken in the euro area to facilitate
the free flow of labor and capital across national
borders, and considerable progress is being made to
enhance competition in product, labor, and financial
markets. But more will need to be done in Europe as
well as in the United States to ensure that our economies
are sufficiently resilient to respond effectively
to all the shocks and adjustments that the future
will surely bring."
Brian
Trumbore
|